• Loading stock data...
Tuesday, May 6, 2025

House Committee Sends Bill Banning College Athlete Employment to House Floor

  • The bill is an indicator of the success of the NCAA lobbying efforts.
  • Because of its partisan nature, the legislation faces a long road before the House can vote on it.
Jan 13, 2021; Washington, DC, USA; The U.S. Capitol Building is seen on Jan. 13, 2021, one week after it was stormed by a pro-Trump mob while a joint session of Congress was certifying the 2020 election victory of President Elect Joe Biden.
Hannah Gaber-USA TODAY

Congress is one step closer to passing a federal law that would prohibit college athletes from ever being classified as employees.

On Thursday, the House Committee on Education and Labor voted to send the “Protecting Student Athletes’ Economic Freedom Act” for consideration on the House floor as either a standalone bill or a rider to another more comprehensive bill governing college athlete compensation. The vote on the four-page bill broke along party lines: 23 Republicans in favor, 16 Democrats opposed.

Rep. Bob Good (R., Va.) quietly introduced the ironically dubbed bill just three weeks ago on May 23. It sped past all other athlete compensation bills to make it into Thursday’s markup agenda—an indicator of the success of the NCAA and Power 5 conferences in their multimillion-dollar congressional campaign to end the athletes’ rights movement. They’ve paid some of the most powerful lobbying and PR firms in D.C. to convince Congress specifically to pass a law usurping three cases arguing that athletes should be considered employees. 

The NCAA said it hopes Congress will use the settlement in the House v. NCAA federal court case, which would allow schools to pay players, as a “road map” for a federal law—one that would prevent players being classified as employees even though they can now get paid.

The athlete employment issue has become highly partisan because of its proximity to the ideological battle over President Joe Biden’s pro-labor administration—and the reactions to this bill have been no different. Several Republican lawmakers spoke in favor of the bill, peddling NCAA talking points about how women’s and Olympic sports would be cut due to budget shortfalls if schools had to treat athletes as employees. They also criticized the involvement of the National Labor Relations Board on the issue, which is currently adjudicating two cases over athlete employment. They even referred to the federal body as “Joe Biden’s NLRB.”

Rep. Bobby Scott (D., Va.) was the only lawmaker in the committee who spoke in opposition of the bill. He said the NLRB should be free to adjudicate the issue itself, and that any legislation would be premature. “The only freedom the bill protects is the Republicans’ freedom to strip varsity athletes from their rights,” he said.

Rep. Lori Trahan (D., Mass.), who is not on the Committee but has been outspoken about college athletes’ rights, released a statement in opposition to the bill after the vote. “Republicans in Congress have decided to plow forward with legislation to limit the rights of college athletes with little to no input from athletes themselves,” she said, adding: “If House Republicans decide to force a vote on this partisan legislation on the floor, I will vote no.”

The bill has faced opposition from several stakeholders outside Congress. The AFL-CIO and eight men’s and women’s professional players’ unions released a statement Thursday morning expressing opposition to the bill. “While conceding to pay athletes, these organizations are doubling down on denying their employee status,” the organizations wrote in a letter to members of Congress. “It’s very simple: If [college athletes] are treated like employees, then they are employees.” UCLA quarterback Chase Griffin, a prominent voice in the athletes’ rights movement, also came out against the bill. 

Even though the bill has made it further than any other on the subject of athlete compensation, it faces a long road ahead. Because of its partisan nature, the proposed legislation will likely have to go through an extended process starting with a debate in the House Rules Committee. However, once the bill reaches the House floor, it could be passed with a simple majority—a legitimate reality given the makeup of the body.

Most other Democrats would likely oppose the bill, one Democratic aide tells Front Office Sports, though some could be swayed by lobbying from universities in their local districts (in addition to the lobbying from the NCAA and power conferences). The aide suggested President Biden wouldn’t sign a bill that reached his desk, either—though that may be unlikely given that Democrats hold a majority in the Senate.

The bill could also be attached as a supplement, or a “rider,” to another more extensive bill governing college athlete economic rights.

But if it does pass in any form—whether on its own or attached to another bill—it could still face opposition not just from Biden but also outside litigators. Paul McDonald, an attorney for plaintiffs in the federal court case over athlete employment status (Johnson v. NCAA), previously told FOS he would challenge the rule in court as unconstitutional. His logic: non-athlete students are allowed to be university employees through work-study programs, but athletes would be stripped of that right. McDonald believes a law of this nature would violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution.

Linkedin
Whatsapp
Copy Link
Link Copied
Link Copied

What to Read

Mar 22, 2025; Miami, FL, USA; Joao Fonseca (BRZ) reacts after winning a point against Ugo Humbert (FRA)(not pictured) on day five of the Miami Open at Hard Rock Stadium.

João Fonseca Is a Teen Tennis Phenom. His Parents Are Overseeing His..

The Brazilian is forgoing a management team in favor of his parents.

2027 NFL Draft in Washington, D.C., Expected to Draw 1 Million Fans

President Donald Trump announced the move on Monday afternoon.

Featured Today

Athlos

Nike Wants to Pull Off the First Women’s Sub-4:00 Mile

Experts speak on whether Nike’s “moonshot” is realistic or a gimmick.
Apr 12, 2025; Cleveland, Ohio, USA; MLB umpire Ron Kulpa (46) calls a third strike during a game between the Cleveland Guardians and the Kansas City Royals at Progressive Field
May 4, 2025

Pro Refs Get Offered Free Lasik for Better Calls. Some Took It

Some pro officials have sprung for the offer for free corrective surgery.
Mint juelps
May 3, 2025

Inside the 120,000-Cup Mint Julep Frenzy of Kentucky Derby Weekend

The official cocktail at Churchill Downs costs $22—or $5,000.
May 1, 2025

How Larry Collmus Became the Longest-Running Kentucky Derby Caller

Collmus will call his 15th straight Derby on NBC.
April 28, 2025

Quinn Ewers Bet on NFL Over NIL—and Left Millions on the Table

The Dolphins picked Ewers in the seventh round of the NFL Draft.
Shaquille O'Neal
April 28, 2025

Shaq Taking GM Role at Sacramento State

The news comes amid the school’s push for FBS status.
Sponsored

Game On: Portfolio Players Stories, Brought to You by E*TRADE from Morgan Stanley

Portfolio Players is our bi-weekly spotlight on the athletes and investors reshaping the business of sports. This week, venture capitalist Kai Cunningham unpacks why athletes land top deals and how the usual investing rules don’t always apply.
Mar 28, 2025; Indianapolis, IN, USA; Kentucky Wildcats guard Lamont Butler (1) dribbles the ball against the Tennessee Volunteers in the first half during a Midwest Regional semifinal of the 2025 NCAA tournament at Lucas Oil Stadium.
April 25, 2025

College Sports Has Become a Billion-Dollar Business. Kentucky Is Embracing It

Kentucky said its LLC would operate similarly to two hospitals run by the university.
Ole Miss
April 24, 2025

Coach Yo: Women’s College Hoops Are ‘Pay for Play’

Ole Miss coach Yolett McPhee-McCuin built a top transfer class this offseason.
Jan 21, 2025; Atlanta, GA, USA; College Football Playoff executive director Rich Clark speaks during the CFP National Championship Host Committee handoff press conference at The Westin Peachtree Plaza, Savannah Ballroom.
April 24, 2025

CFP Meetings End With No Major Changes to 12-Team Playoff—for Now

For now, the complicated seeding process will remain in place.
April 24, 2025

The House Settlement Is in Jeopardy. Here’s What It Will Take to..

The parties will try to salvage the settlement over the next two weeks.