• Loading stock data...
Sunday, August 10, 2025
Tuned In returns to NYC on September 16. Hear from the biggest names in sports media. Click here to get your spot

Federal Judge Approves House v. NCAA Settlement, Allowing College Athlete Pay

The House v. NCAA settlement will allow all Division I schools to directly pay players for the first time in NCAA history. 

Apr 5, 2025; San Antonio, TX, USA; Florida Gators forward Sam Alexis (4) and Florida Gators center Micah Handlogten (3) celebrate after defeating the Auburn Tigers in the semifinals of the men's Final Four of the 2025 NCAA Tournament at the Alamodome.
Robert Deutsch-Imagn Images
Oct 3, 2021; Inglewood, California, USA; A general overall view of the NFL Network building adjacent to SoFi Stadium.
Exclusive

ESPN Taking Over NFL Network’s Lease Near SoFi Stadium

The network is picking up a little real estate in its mega-deal.
Read Now
August 6, 2025 |

Starting July 1, all Division I schools will be able to directly pay players for the first time in NCAA history. 

That’s all thanks to the House v. NCAA settlement, which federal judge Claudia Wilken approved on Friday after months of deliberation and a lengthy objection process. (Over the past few weeks, the settlement was almost tanked due to an issue over roster limits—but a solution submitted on May 7 appears to have satisfied Wilken’s concerns.)

The settlement will usher in a new era in college sports where athletes aren’t considered employees, but can finally get a cut of the billions of dollars of broadcast revenue they’ve helped generate.

In her 76-page opinion, Wilken called it “outstanding” that lawyers were able to negotiate on behalf of players and acknowledged that both she and the lawyers have been adjudicating and litigating major antitrust claims against the NCAA for more than a decade.

“The settlement agreement here reflects compromises that were made in light of those legal Precedents [referring to previous cases], which demonstrate that success at trial can mean that student-athlete compensation restrictions may be lessened but not eliminated,” Wilken wrote. “Despite some compromises, the settlement agreement nevertheless will result in extraordinary relief for members of the settlement classes. … It would permit levels and types of student-athlete compensation that have never been permitted in the history of college sports, while also very generously compensating Division I student-athletes who suffered past harms.”

In a letter to schools Friday night, NCAA president Charlie Baker called the settlement “an exciting moment for everyone involved in college sports.” Commissioners across the board published statements praising Wilken’s decision. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, for example, called it a “significant milestone for the meaningful support of our student-athletes and a pivotal step toward establishing long-term sustainability for college sports.”

The settlement consolidates three federal antitrust cases: House v. NCAA, Carter v. NCAA, and Hubbard v. NCAA. 

House v. NCAA, arguably the most consequential of the three, was filed in 2020 against the NCAA and former Power 5 conferences, arguing that players deserved damages for being prohibited from earning NIL (name, image, and likeness) payments before the NCAA changed its rules in 2021. It also argued that the definition of NIL should be expanded to include things like broadcast television rights fees. 

The settlement will offer $2.8 billion in damages, as well as allow all D-I schools to offer up to $20.5 million to all the current players in their athletic departments (a number that increases incrementally over 10 years, during the lifetime of the injunctive relief). Schools must offer money to all sports, though they don’t have to offer equitable amounts; the Trump-led Department of Education has said that revenue-sharing payments wouldn’t be subject to Title IX. Wilken noted in her opinion that an outside expert estimated the 10-year figure would amount to $19 billion in “new benefits and compensation” for current and future athletes. Going forward, there will also be no limits on scholarships—with roster limits replacing them. 

The settlement does have other stipulations, however. 

NIL collectives will face more scrutiny with deals they offer players. The settlement sets up a clearinghouse to check whether NIL collective deals appear to be “fair-market value,” instead of “pay-for-play” deals. The clearinghouse is run through software created by Deloitte, with the opportunity for appeal to an independent body.

The most controversial part of the settlement was roster limits. Hundreds of current college athletes and prospective athletes in high school lost roster spots they were promised for the upcoming school year. After flooding the court with objections and raising awareness on social media, they succeeded in swaying Wilken to demand that the settlement guarantee no athletes would lose roster spots as a result of the proposal’s implementation. The parties submitted a solution two weeks later that allows schools to give players their roster spots back—but didn’t require that they do so.

Wilken said that this solution was satisfactory. She added that schools shouldn’t be forced to return roster spots because, as the NCAA had noted, “roster spots aren’t guaranteed.” She also noted that eliminating scholarship prohibitions would result in tens of thousands of new scholarships for players currently and in the future. Finally, she said that athletes could sue for damages over the implementation of roster limits.

Wilken was not swayed by concerns that objectors raised such as gender inequity in damage payments and the lack of representation for future athletes. 

She said several suggested the revenue-sharing cap itself violates antitrust law—but that as with roster limits, athletes were free to sue the NCAA and power conferences for damages related to the cap on revenue-sharing. She also defended the legality of the NIL clearinghouse, and said that neutral arbitration would “be accompanied by due process protections and a degree of transparency that class members do not have under current NCAA rules.”

For athletic departments, the next step will be implementation. They’ve already spent months preparing for this new era by hiring “general managers,” announcing plans for how they’ll split up the funds among teams, and looking for new fundraising opportunities. Meanwhile, NIL collectives have begun offering player contracts that frontload multiple years of an NIL deal before July 1, so they aren’t subject to the clearinghouse. Collectives have also begun altering their strategies in order to comply with the new rules. 

Schools will have 30 days to submit lists of “designated student-athletes” who will be exempt from roster limits. Individual teams will have to decide whether to offer these players their spots back.

The power conferences—which will be tasked with enforcing the revenue-sharing cap, NIL clearinghouse, and roster limits—have created an enforcement entity, called the “College Sports Commission,” which launched formally Friday night with a website and an account on X. A press release said the commission’s first CEO would be former MLB executive Bryan Seeley.

The NCAA will not be involved in the College Sports Commission. “As the defendant conferences now own several facets of rulemaking and enforcement related to specific settlement areas, the NCAA will be able to move away from certain enforcement activity that, despite the best efforts of many, wasn’t working well,” Baker said.

The NCAA and power conferences will undoubtedly take the settlement to Congress as part of their multimillion-dollar federal lobbying campaign to regain control over the athletes’ rights movement, and guarantee that players aren’t employees even though they’re getting paid.

Employment remains the biggest existential question. Wilken said that the settlement wouldn’t preclude college athletes from engaging in collective bargaining in the future if they were deemed employees. But she noted: “This is an antitrust action, not a labor law case. The question of whether student-athletes are employees who can unionize and engage in collective bargaining is not one for adjudication and resolution in this litigation.”

Linkedin
Whatsapp
Copy Link
Link Copied
Link Copied

What to Read

Dec 14, 2019; Philadelphia, PA, USA; President Donald Trump wave during the second quarter of the game between the Navy Midshipmen and the Army Black Knights at Lincoln Financial Field

‘Political Gold’: Trump Putting His Stamp on College Sports 

Trump has embraced executive action on hot-button college sports issues.
Chad Ochocinco

Shannon Sharpe, Chad Ochocinco Settle $20 Million Defamation Suit 

It’s the second multimillion-dollar lawsuit Sharpe has settled in recent weeks.

Three Schools Sue Mountain West, Commish Over Withheld Funds

Boise State, Colorado State, and Utah State intensified the court battle.

WNBA Struggling to Prevent Repeat Dildo Incidents

The league appears to have no answers to the copycats plaguing games.

Featured Today

Inked Under Anesthesia: Athletes Getting $50,000 Tattoos

High-end studios, elite artist teams, and hours under anesthesia.
Coco Gauff at New York Liberty
August 2, 2025

How the New York Liberty Became the Hottest Ticket in Town

Once banished to the burbs, the Libs are now Brooklyn’s marquee attraction.
Las Vegas sign
July 29, 2025

College Sports Embracing Vegas After Years of Cold Shoulder

The Big Ten became the latest newcomer to Sin City.
2000, Jupiter, FL, USA; FILE PHOTO; Montreal Expos pitcher Hideki Irabu in action on the mound against the New York Mets at Roger Dean Stadium during Spring Training
July 28, 2025

Dead Sports Franchises Are Alive and Well on Twitter

The Expos, Sonics, and Whalers have active social media accounts.

March Madness Fields Will Stay Put at 68—at Least Until 2027

NCAA tournament expansion is still on the table for 2027.
Stanford
August 1, 2025

John Donahoe Taking Over Stanford Sports After Rocky Nike Tenure

John Donahoe will be Stanford’s AD after a four-year stint running Nike.
May 4, 2017; Columbus, OH, USA; The BYU Cougars against the Long Beach State 49ers at St. John Arena
August 4, 2025

Federal Judge Tells Stephen F. Austin to Reinstate Women’s Sports Teams

Schools may not be able to follow through on threats of cuts.
Sponsored

Hottest Matchups Following NFL Schedule Release

The NFL released the 2025 regular-season schedule, and anticipation is already building in the ticket marketplace with four months to go.
NCAA Track
July 31, 2025

NIL Collectives Can Still Pay College Athletes, With Some Restrictions

NIL collectives will still play a pivotal role in recruiting.
Rutgers
July 28, 2025

Rutgers Finds New Athletic Director After Almost a Year

Rutgers’s previous athletic director, Pat Hobbs, resigned in August 2024.
Jan 20, 2025; Atlanta, GA, USA; Notre Dame Fighting Irish tight end Mitchell Evans (88) runs the ball against the Ohio State Buckeyes in the second half in the CFP National Championship college football game at Mercedes-Benz Stadium.
July 25, 2025

‘More Bark Than Bite’: What Trump’s Executive Order Means for College Sports

“This all comes down to Congress and the courts.”
July 24, 2025

UNC’s Bill Belichick Brings His NFL Swagger to ACC Media Days

UNC is becoming one of the most interesting stories in college football.