• Loading stock data...
Thursday, October 9, 2025

Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Pro-Athlete Decision in NCAA v. Alston

  • The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of athletes in NCAA v. Alston, with Justice Neil Gorsuch writing the opinion.
  • The decision has far reaching implications for the future of NCAA sports and amateurism.
supreme_court
Design: Alex Brooks

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of college athletes in the case NCAA v. Alston on Monday. It found that the NCAA did violate antitrust law by limiting the amount of “non-cash education-related benefits” that schools can offer FBS football and basketball players.

The majority opinion was written by Justice Neil Gorsuch. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, extremely critical of the NCAA during oral arguments in March, wrote a searing concurring opinion.

It’s a landmark decision that shows the NCAA’s beloved model of amateurism is not safe in the high court: The ruling leaves the door open for athletes to challenge amateurism in court in the future.

The ruling also has implications for how strict the NCAA can write its rules governing athletes profiting off their name, image, and likeness.

“While today’s decision preserves the lower court ruling, it also reaffirms the NCAA’s authority to adopt reasonable rules and repeatedly notes that the NCAA remains free to articulate what are and are not truly educational benefits, consistent with the NCAA’s mission to support student-athletes,” the NCAA said in part in a statement.

Jeffrey Kessler, lawyer for the plaintiffs, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

NCAA v. Alston was originally brought in 2014 by a plaintiff class led by former West Virginia University running back Shawne Alston. It came on the heels of another landmark case, O’Bannon v. NCAA, which found that the NCAA violated antitrust law by not compensating athletes for the use of their name, image, and likeness in EA video games.

The ruling itself centers on whether the Ninth Circuit Court correctly applied the test to see whether an organization violated the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Supreme Court affirmed that the lower court did this properly, and systemically took down the NCAA’s arguments one by one. 

But the ruling itself was narrow. “The court was careful to explain that it’s decision only applies to the NCAA’s rules that limit educationally related benefits,” Kennyhertz Perry sports attorney Mit Winter told FOS. “It doesn’t apply to the NCAA’s rules that limit compensation related to athletic performance, such as the value of an athletic scholarship or cash payments for performance.”  

The NCAA will have the power to define what education-related benefits are, however. Conferences or schools can also legally set their own limits.

This may have an immediate impact on the already complicated recruiting landscape. Winter doesn’t think many schools are ready to expand their education-related benefits immediately. “Those that start offering them first may gain a recruiting advantage,” he said.

The ruling also has several broader implications. The high court took down a major legal defense the NCAA has used for decades. In many cases, it has cited pro-amateurism language from the opinion in a 1980s antitrust case NCAA v. Board of Regents as a bulletproof defense of not paying players.

But the Supreme Court’s opinion rejected this defense. “Board of Regents may suggest that courts should take care when assessing the NCAA’s restraints on student-athlete compensation, sensitive to their procompetitive possibilities,” Gorsuch wrote. “But these remarks do not suggest that courts must reflexively reject all challenges to the NCAA’s compensation restrictions.”

The court then went on to say that if “market realities” change with the times, so to may the assessment of antitrust violations.

“That language was a key part of the NCAA’s legal strategy,” Boise State sports law professor Sam Ehrlich, who submitted two amicus briefs for the case, told FOS. “And this opinion harms that in a big way, despite its relative narrowness.”

Concurring opinions are generally less binding than the main opinion. But if the main opinion gave athletes a legal roadmap to challenge amateurism in the future, Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion provides an open invitation.

“The NCAA couches its arguments for not paying student athletes in innocuous labels,” Kavanaugh wrote. “But the labels cannot disguise the reality: The NCAA’s business model would be flatly illegal in almost any other industry in America.”

He provides examples in other industries, including: “All of the restaurants in a region cannot come together to cut cooks’ wages on the theory that ‘customers prefer’ to eat food from low-paid cooks.”

The ruling could also affect how the NCAA can write rules governing athletes to profit off their name, image, and likeness. The NCAA still hasn’t passed rules, claiming it was waiting for the Justice Department — and this ruling — to see if its strict proposal might violate antitrust law. 

Now that the court has made it clear the NCAA is subject to normal antitrust scrutiny, it may have to tread more carefully and pass less restrictive rules. In the NCAA’s statement on the case, President Mark Emmert said he is still “committed” to passing NIL rules.

The NCAA “will have to proceed very carefully on NIL (and everything else) moving forward,” Ehrlich said.

Six state laws will take effect on July 1, restoring this right to NCAA athletes. But because of the NCAA’s delay, athletes in many states won’t have state laws by July 1. Congress will not pass a federal law by then, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) told reporters in attendance at one of two Senate hearings on the subject in the past two weeks.

The NCAA plans to discuss temporary proposals this week, according to a letter written by NCAA president Mark Emmert that was obtained by the Associated Press. 

As the college sports industry grapples with the ruling, it’s clear that, as Kavanaugh wrote, “The NCAA is not above the law.”

“I think this opinion shows that sports exceptionalism arguments will no longer carry the day,” University of Baltimore sports law professor Dionne Koller told FOS. “Coming to court and arguing that the magic of college sports will be lost if the NCAA doesn’t get complete deference is no longer a winning position.”

Linkedin
Whatsapp
Copy Link
Link Copied
Link Copied

What to Read

Sep 1, 2025; Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels head coach Bill Belichick on the field before the game at Kenan Stadium

UNC’s Disastrous Season Continues With Report of NCAA Rules Violation

A UNC cornerbacks coach reportedly gave sideline passes to a player’s family.
Inside NCAA Headquarters located in Indianapolis on Friday, March 10, 2023. Ncaa President Charlie Baker

NCAA Approves Plan to Let D-I College Athletes Bet on Pro Sports

The proposal still needs to be approved by D-II and D-III committees.

NFL and College Football TV Ratings Continue to Surge, Especially for CBS

The network’s singleheader coverage Sunday drew huge viewership.

Featured Today

Paul Cartier

Sports Organists Are Still Thriving in the Era of Raucous Arena Music

“When they walk out and they see a real organ guy, it’s like, ‘Wow.’”
Sep 27, 2025; Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; Milwaukee Brewers center fielder Jackson Chourio (11) rounds the bases after hitting a home run during the sixth inning against the Cincinnati Reds at American Family Field.
October 4, 2025

Milwaukee Moneyball: Brewers Are Beating MLB’s Deeper Pockets

Milwaukee is holding its own against big-budget competitors.
Kōloa Rum Company Rum Rusher
September 27, 2025

Panthers Bubbly, Jets Wine, Manning Whiskey: The Sports Booze Boom

A sommelier dives into the sports booze trend—and tries Jets wine.
Nov 17, 2024; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Pittsburgh Steelers fans wave Terrible Towels against the Baltimore Ravens during the fourth quarter at Acrisure Stadium
September 26, 2025

Steelers’ Irish Roots Are Deeper Than NFL Dublin Game

The Steelers have history and the foundation for a future in Ireland.
Oct 4, 2025; Lincoln, Nebraska, USA; Nebraska Cornhuskers defensive back DeShon Singleton (8) celebrates after making an interception during the game against Michigan State at Memorial Stadium.
exclusive

Big Ten Considering Investment From California Pension Fund

Under the proposal, Big Ten would spin assets into a new entity.
October 7, 2025

NIL Hits Week 1: Auburn’s Atlanta Game Marks Next Step in Player..

The teams will play in the 2026 Aflac Kickoff Game.
Sep 20, 2025; Lincoln, Nebraska, USA; Nebraska Cornhuskers head coach Matt Rhule walks onto the field before the game against the Michigan Wolverines at Memorial Stadium.
October 7, 2025

Big Ten Teams Grapple With Long Flights, Time-Zone Hurdles

Coaches across the country are noticing some impact.
Sponsored

How Jenny Just Is Shaping the Future of Sports Ownership

Jenny Just on bringing her investment experience to sports ownership.
Oct 4, 2025; Pasadena, California, USA; UCLA Bruins quarterback Nico Iamaleava (9) passes the ball during the fourth quarter against the Penn State Nittany Lions at Rose Bowl.
October 6, 2025

The Improbability of UCLA’s Incredible Upset Win Against Penn State

Before UCLA beat Penn State, donors were deeply unhappy.
Sep 27, 2025; University Park, Pennsylvania, USA; Penn State Nittany Lions head coach James Franklin reacts during the fourth quarter against the Oregon Ducks at Beaver Stadium.
October 6, 2025

Penn State Has a $50 Million James Franklin Problem

Franklin’s team lost to unranked UCLA on Saturday despite being heavy favorites.
October 5, 2025

CFB’s New Parity Era: Penn State, Texas Top-25 Exits Signal Shift

Penn State and Texas fall entirely out of the top-25 rankings.
Cody Campbell
October 4, 2025

Fox, ABC Reject Ad Accusing Power Conference Commissioners of Greed

Cody Campbell said the ads were pulled after he paid for them.