• Loading stock data...
Wednesday, January 15, 2025

NCAA Athlete Advisory Committees Send Bizarre Letters to Congress

  • On Monday, the NCAA’s athlete committees published letters to Congress to provide their perspective on NIL and athlete employment.
  • But the letters allegedly used language similar to NCAA talking points. Current and former athletes say they don’t represent all athletes’ views.
NCAA letters
Syndication: The Daily Advertiser

On Monday, the NCAA’s Student-Athlete Advisory Committees (SAAC) from all three divisions sent letters to lawmakers advocating for the athletes’ perspective of a federal NIL law. They stated they believe athletes should not be considered employees of their universities.

The letter from Division I SAAC, a five-page letter addressed to 12 Senators and House members, consisted of language and talking points eerily similar to those of NCAA President Charlie Baker, as well as official NCAA communications and even legal documents. In many cases, these points are easily disputable.

While the letter says SAAC represents the interests of all NCAA athletes, this document is certainly not representative of all their opinions, current and former athletes told FOS and expressed on social media.

The letter also illustrates a core issue with the NCAA: even the now-enhanced athlete representation provides little room for real power or conversations about radical reforms. Current and former athletes told FOS that the views expressed publicly by SAAC are heavily influenced, if not completely drafted, by NCAA employees. They see SAAC as more of an extension of NCAA PR than a true voice for current players.

“People want to take advantage of [athletes] in these situations,” former Clemson football player Justin Falcinelli, now the VP of the advocacy group the College Football Players Association, told FOS. “You are dealing with lobbying industry professionals trying to help you fulfill their agenda and the NCAA’s agenda. So be wary of things like this that are coming from top-down.”

Breaking Down The Letters

In the D-I letter, athletes wrote that they hope Congress enacts a uniform federal law that will even out the landscape — which currently consists of more than 30 disparate state laws nationwide. They also asked for a law that protects athletes from being exploited by bad actors and shady deals.

These two requests aren’t necessarily surprising (though some athletes entrenched in NIL have said they couldn’t care less whether Congress enacts a federal NIL law.) 

The D-I letter said — in boldface and italicized type — that athletes should not be considered employees. 

“Preserving the traditional collegiate experience, where student-athletes are first and foremost students, is essential for maintaining the integrity and values inherent in college sports,” the letter read. 

The letter cited four reasons. 

The first two, which stated that amateurism is better for academic success and protects athletes from being over-committed to sports, are easily disputed by NCAA surveys suggesting athletes already spent far more hours on sports than the governing body technically allows. They’re already controlled most hours of the day by their sport, and they can be “fired” already by losing their scholarship in most cases annually.

The athletes then held that they shouldn’t be considered employees for reasons beyond their benefit. The letter noted that it would be “easier” for schools to “comply with Title IX” if athletes weren’t employees. It even advocated for schools’ financial interests, writing, “the cost associated with salaries, benefits, compliance with labor laws, and other employment-related expenses would put significant strain on the financial viability of athletic programs.”

As multiple legal settlements have shown, NCAA schools must comply with Title IX no matter how much money they possess. Similarly, there are proven benefits for schools to sponsoring multiple teams — in fact, many have reinstated men’s Olympic Sports teams after budget cuts in addition to women’s sports teams.

SAAC’s final and perhaps most jarring stance was that Congress should grant the NCAA “safe harbor from legal complaints to oversee college sports nationally effectively.” 

In other words, athletes are asking Congress to pass antitrust protection of sorts so that the NCAA won’t be subject to multiple lawsuits. 

“I cannot think of a single reason why” a college athlete would advocate for this, Falcinelli said. “There are a lot of real dangers that should not be glossed over.”

The Student-Athlete Advisory Committees representing Divisions II and III also noted that they didn’t want to be considered employees — though that stance appears much more believable given that lower-division players generate less revenue for their schools than those in D-I — and the NCAA’s rules exert far less control over them than their D-I counterparts.

Strange Similarities 

The origins of the opinions expressed in these articles and some of the exact language used can be directly traced to NCAA official talking points during speeches, in legal documents, and in public relations communications.

“Seeing a lot of these words in the media lately, and a lot of these same bullet points coming down, I would like to challenge Cody Shimp and a lot of other SAAC members if this was even voted on by SAAC?” Falcinelli said. “If this was supposed to be a representative statement by SAAC?” 

The following are just a few examples of times that college sports officials speaking for the NCAA — or NCAA lawyers or employees — have peddled the same talking points as SAAC’s letter. In many cases, even the phrasing is similar. 

  • In January, NCAA Board of Governors chair Linda Livingstone told members that the NCAA’s top priorities were prohibiting athletes from becoming employees, getting a federal NIL law that preempts state laws, and getting a form of an antitrust exemption. 
  • While advocating for the NCAA’s interests on Capitol Hill last week, Baker also preached the need for a federal law that “preempts” state laws.
  • These are all stances taken by previous President Mark Emmert.
  • Multiple legal documents in the NCAA antitrust cases Johnson v. NCAA and NCAA v. Alston argued that college sports would crumble if athletes were considered employees or even offered extra compensation from schools. 

In a statement to Front Office Sports, the NCAA neither confirmed nor denied that NCAA employees were involved in crafting these three letters, which were touted as the voice of athletes representing NCAA membership. 

“As part of the NCAA’s efforts to better incorporate students in the decision-making process, several student-athletes hold seats on key leadership committees, including the Subcommittee on Congressional Engagement and Action and the Transformation Committee,” NCAA SVP of External Affairs Tim Buckley said in a statement. “As members of these committees, student-athletes participated in discussions and guided the creation of NCAA policies and messaging around critical issues.”

But sports attorney Maddie Salamone, a former D-I SAAC Chair, confirmed to FOS that NCAA employees were always involved in drafting public communications that were attributed to SAAC athletes.

“Anything that got released publicly (any kind of official statement) had to go through a ton of red tape before being released,” Salamone, also a VP, of the CFBPA said. “NCAA legal staff and media team would review, edit, and stylize statements. … This included a review of a newsletter we put out while I was on SAAC.”

The NCAA’s ‘Mouthpiece?’

Theoretically, SAAC is supposed to represent an independent athlete-centric voice on NCAA issues. The NCAA has even enhanced athletes’ roles on SAAC and other NCAA committees since its new constitution was passed in 2022.

Of course, SAAC’s views won’t represent every athlete nationwide. But current and former athletes FOS spoke with say the organization represents only the most conservative of athlete views. 

It’s unclear if the entirety of D-I SAAC is supportive of the letter. While D-II and D-III SAAC letters included the names of multiple committee members, the D-I letter was signed solely by D-I SAAC Chair Cody Shimp, a graduate assistant baseball coach at St. Bonaventure University. (Shimp did not immediately respond to a FOS request for comment.)

Beyond this, there are clear examples that athletes don’t agree with the letter’s core principle that athletes shouldn’t be considered employees. Look no further than Johnson v. NCAA, a case winding through federal court brought by several college athletes who believe they deserve employee status and minimum wage.

As the NCAA throws its weight behind lobbying in Congress, some are concerned that the committee’s public communications are aimed at helping further the governing body’s agenda rather than accurately representing athletes’ views.

“D-I SAAC is a useless mouthpiece of the NCAA,” one current D-I athlete who has previously been involved with SAAC told FOS. “The group never takes controversial opinions … they are all good people, but they get tricked into thinking they are really doing groundbreaking work by NCAA leadership when in reality the group does very little.” The athlete said that SAAC members are “afraid to step on toes” because they want to work in college sports after they graduate.

Salamone believes the NCAA has allowed SAAC members to speak on more “controversial” topics than it did when she was in college, but noted that the governing body always heavily policed what athletes said in public.

In the past, “SAAC members were often manipulated (or attempts were made to manipulate) to see things through the lens of the NCAA and what it wanted,” Salamone said. “Things were skewed to make certain ideas sound like a positive for athletes that really weren’t.”

Linkedin
Whatsapp
Copy Link
Link Copied
Link Copied

What to Read

Carson Beck, Quinn Ewers Highlight NIL Mania In College Football

The former Georgia quarterback is getting paid big-time to transfer to Miami.
exclusive

Carson Beck Has Scored Nearly $10M in NIL Deals in 12 Months:..

A source says the $4 million figure attributed to Canes Connection is inaccurate.
Ohio State Buckeyes defensive end Jack Sawyer (33) knocks the ball out of the hands of Texas Longhorns quarterback Quinn Ewers (3) and returns the fumble for a touchdown in the fourth quarter of the Cotton Bowl Classic during the College Football Playoff semifinal game at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas on January, 10, 2025.

College Football Is Closer Than Ever to Perfecting the Championship Process

Despite valid criticisms, the first expanded Playoff is working.

Featured Today

Race leader and eventual stage winner Primož ROGLIČ (SVN/RedBull-Bora-Hansgrohe) in the final kilometer up the finish climb of stage 19 from Logroño to Alto De Moncalvillo (ESP/168km) of the 79th La Vuelta Ciclista a España 2024 on 6 September. // Kristof Ramon / Red Bull Content Pool // SI202409060905 // Usage for editorial use only //Primož ROGLIČ (SVN/RedBull-Bora-Hansgrohe) congratulated by teammate Florian LIPOWITZ (DEU/RedBull - BORA - hansgrohe) after a very strong stage 13 from Lugo to Puerto De Ancares (ESP/171km) of the 79th La Vuelta Ciclista a España 2024 on 30 August

Red Bull Is on a Hot Streak in Sports. Can It Win..

The company is betting on a big future in cycling.
Jan 2, 2025; New Orleans, LA, USA; Notre Dame Fighting Irish head coach Marcus Freeman (R) reacts on the sidelines in the final minute against the Georgia Bulldogs during the fourth quarter at Caesars Superdome.
January 9, 2025

Amid Realignment Mania, Notre Dame Stayed Independent. It Paid Off

How the CFP semifinal-bound Fighting Irish made their business model work.
Ohio State wide receiver Jeremiah Smith (4) celebrates a first-down catch against Oregon during the 2025 Rose Bowl in Pasadena, Calif.
January 3, 2025

The Biggest Changes to College Sports Are Coming in 2025

Sweeping developments could affect the college sports foundation this year.
Dec 31, 2024; Chicago, Illinois, USA; Chicago Blackhawks center Connor Bedard (98) walks out to the rink before the Winter Classic against the St. Louis Blues at Wrigley Field
January 1, 2025

Glitzy NHL New Year’s Eve Winter Classic Showcased Connor Bedard’s Star Power

The business of Bedard—on full display—is crucial for the NHL.
Ohio State quarterback Will Howard (18) yells instructions to his team during the College Football Playoff semifinal game against the Texas Longhorns in the Cotton Bowl at AT&T Stadium on Friday, Jan. 10, 2024 in Arlington, Texas.

CFP Semifinals TV Ratings Drop 17% in 12-Team Format’s First Year

This year’s semifinal games averaged 19.2 million viewers on ESPN.
Dec 27, 2024; Las Vegas, NV, USA; Helmets at the line fo scrimmage as DUPLICATE***Southern California Trojans long snapper Hank Pepper (31) snaps the ball against the Texas A&M Aggies at Allegiant Stadium.
January 10, 2025

Another College Athlete Employment Movement Dies Ahead of NLRB’s Expected Swing

The union representing Dartmouth athletes withdrew its petition recently, too.
January 10, 2025

With National Title in Sight, Ohio State’s Ryan Day Closes In on..

“It’s what life’s all about,” Day said of the doubters he faced.
Sponsored

How UBS Crafts Impactful Partnerships Across Sports, Arts, and Culture

As UBS continues to expand its impressive array of sports and entertainment partnerships, the company solidifies its position as a leader in wealth management.
January 9, 2025

Notre Dame Win Brings Its Solo CFP Purse to $20 Million

The Fighting Irish advanced to the national championship game.
January 9, 2025

Full-Circle Quinn Ewers Saga in Spotlight at Cotton Bowl

The junior has one year of college eligibility remaining.
Dec 31, 2024; Glendale, AZ, USA; Penn State Nittany Lions head coach James Franklin against the Boise State Broncos in the Fiesta Bowl at State Farm Stadium.
January 9, 2025

James Franklin Wants All Schools in a Conference—Including Notre Dame

Notre Dame and Penn State play Thursday in the Orange Bowl.
January 9, 2025

Remaining CFP Coaches Vie for National Title—and Big Pay Raises

Winning a college football national championship is typically lucrative.