• Loading stock data...
Saturday, July 19, 2025
Law

House v. NCAA Settlement Has a Little-Known Federal Lobbying Provision

The provision aims to ensure plaintiffs’ lawyers won’t disrupt the federal lobbying campaign the NCAA has waged to protect amateurism.

Apr 6, 2025; Tampa, FL, USA; A general overall view of the opening tipoff between UConn Huskies forward Sarah Strong (left) and South Carolina Gamecocks forward Chloe Kitts at midcourt on the Final Four logo during the national championship of the women's 2025 NCAA tournament at Amalie Arena.
Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

The House v. NCAA settlement has several controversial provisions—including one over roster limits that has prompted Northern District of California judge Claudia Wilken to threaten to reject it. But there’s another, less talked about requirement that would prevent plaintiff counsel from engaging in some of the biggest debates in Congress over the future of athletes rights. 

The provision, laid out in a short paragraph in Article 7 of the settlement, aims to ensure the plaintiffs’ lawyers won’t disrupt the yearslong, multimillion-dollar federal lobbying campaign in Congress the NCAA and Power 5 conferences have waged to protect amateurism and rein in the athletes’ rights movement.  The settlement essentially says lawyers for the college athletes—who have sued the NCAA—-must support any legislation in line with the settlement, and remain publicly neutral on key related issues, like athlete employment.

Former Duke men’s basketball player and attorney Richard Ford, who has studied the NCAA’s lobbying efforts, filed an objection to the provision in January. “It would transform Class Counsel from advocates for their clients into lobbyists for the NCAA, creating a conflict of interest,” he wrote in a letter to the court, calling the provision “unprecedented” and “extraordinary.” 

The NCAA’s lobbying campaign began in 2019, when it became clear state laws would force the NCAA into allowing players to profit off their NIL (name, image, and likeness). Using several of the top firms in the country, as well as a bipartisan public relations strategy, the groups are asking for a federal law that creates a situation unlike any other industry in the country: College athletes would get paid for their labor, but wouldn’t be classified as employees. Such a law would theoretically allow the NCAA to impose salary caps and restrict player movement. Professional leagues, however, are only allowed to do so because player unions agree to these restrictions through collective bargaining. 

The NCAA and power conferences haven’t been shy about using the House settlement as part of this initiative. NCAA President Charlie Baker has said that federal lawmakers told him to make as many adjustments to the college sports business model as possible before coming to Congress asking for help. He sees the House settlement, and other changes, as proof that the college sports governing body has done everything it can without lawmakers—and that the settlement should be used as a roadmap for a law that also includes the aforementioned provisions.

But the settlement also guarantees that some of the most well-known lawyers in the country on athletes’ rights issues won’t be allowed to cross the NCAA in Washington. 

The NCAA’s wishlist goes something like this: It wants a federal bill that will, first, preempt any and all state laws relating to college sports, and second, give the NCAA antitrust protections to shield it from future athlete pay lawsuits. Depending on how far the antitrust protections extend, the NCAA might even have the power to roll back some of the rights athletes have gained. The NCAA and Power 5 are also lobbying for a bill to include a provision prohibiting athletes from being deemed employees. 

Compare those demands with the settlement terms as they stand now: The plaintiff lawyers, led by Steve Berman and Jeffrey Kessler, will be required to use “reasonable efforts” to support antitrust protections and the preemption of state laws that would protect the terms of the settlement.

They also must “take no position, and thus be neutral, in all instances and in all forums and venues, on the issue of whether student-athletes should be considered/deemed ‘employees’ or whether collective bargaining should be permitted for compensation of student-athletes.” The same goes for proposals that would give athletes more benefits beyond what the settlement allows.

In a conversation with FOS last fall, Steve Berman, attorney for the plaintiffs, pushed back against the idea that the lobbying provision would force him to support the NCAA’s agenda. “If the NCAA asks us to, we will express our views to Congress that they should be free from future lawsuits that raise the same issues that were raised in our litigation,” he said. Issues raised in the litigation include revenue-sharing, expanding the definition of revenue-sharing, imposing limits on NIL collective deals, and eliminating scholarship limits. 

“We will not comment on anything beyond that,” Berman said. “So whether the students should be considered employees, we won’t comment on that.” But notably, Berman and co-lead Jeff Kessler can’t publicly argue in favor of athlete employee status, either.

Since Republicans swept both houses of Congress and the White House in November, the NCAA has ramped up lobbying efforts hoping that Republicans would be more amenable to their demands. Several lawmakers, including Senate Commerce Committee chairman Ted Cruz (R., Texas), are negotiating legislation to govern college athlete compensation. If and when the settlement is approved, the NCAA and commissioners will take it to Capitol Hill as part of this push (though it’s unclear how successful they’ll be).

The lawyers who argued on athletes’ behalf are expected to be called on, whether in public hearings or private discussions, to advise lawmakers. “Class Counsels’ promise to become Defendants’ lobbying agents will likely carry great weight in Congress,” Ford writes. “This Court’s tacit approval of it may carry even greater weight.” 

Ford was the only objector to express these concerns at the final approval hearing on April 7. Ultimately, however, Judge Claudia Wilken said in a recent court order that the only remaining issue with the settlement was related to roster limits—and not lobbying.

Linkedin
Whatsapp
Copy Link
Link Copied
Link Copied

What to Read

Jul 13, 2025; Atlanta, GA, USA; MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred announces the pick for the Athletics pick during the MLB Draft at The Coca-Cola Roxy.

Manfred Says MLB Had Wrong Approach to Creators Like Jomboy

“You gotta go where people are going,” the commissioner said.
(NCL_OSU_11_SUGAR_LAURON 04JAN11) Ohio State Buckeyes quarterback Terrelle Pryor (2) slips around the Arkansas Razorbacks defense during first half of the Sugar Bowl at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans, January 4, 2011.

Terrelle Pryor’s Case for NIL Backpay Dismissed in Court

Pryor played seven years in the NFL after leaving OSU amid a scandal.
Jun 9, 2025; Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Cleveland Guardians starting pitcher Luis Ortiz (45) reacts after giving up a home run during the fourth inning against the Cincinnati Reds at Progressive Field.

MLB Pitcher’s Paid Leave Extended Through August As Betting Probe Continues

Leagues have been dealing with a host of sports betting issues.

Featured Today

Jul 21, 2024; Ayrshire, SCT; Xander Schauffele celebrates with Claret Jug after winning the Open Championship golf tournament at Royal Troon.

The Boozy History and Traditions of The Open’s Claret Jug

The Open awards the world’s most famous wine decanter.
2025 PDC World Darts Championship Final - Luke Littler vs Michael Van Gerwen
July 16, 2025

A Teen Darts Prodigy Is Becoming Bigger Than the Game Itself

Luke ‘The Nuke’ Littler is cashing in on his devastatingly accurate shot.
May 31, 2025; Philadelphia, PA, USA; Sydney McLaughin-Levrone (USA) reacts before the women's 100m hurdles during the Grand Slam Track Philadelphia at Franklin Field
exclusive
July 13, 2025

Track’s New Money Is Running Into Old Problems

The sport’s big-money era has hit some speed bumps in 2025.
Bobbleheads are seen at Vintage Indy Sports, Tuesday, April 29, 2025 in Speedway. The local sports memorabilia store opened recently.
July 12, 2025

Baseball’s Bobbleheads Are the Center of the Collectibles Universe

Baseball’s most important keepsake drives long lines—and big business.
Princeton

Transgender Sprinter Sues Princeton Over Last-Minute Ban

The sprinter was removed 15 minutes before her race.
Caster Semenya
July 10, 2025

Caster Semenya’s Legal Win Could Reopen Fight Against Testosterone Limits

The Olympian champion’s appeal against gender eligibility rules continues.
July 16, 2025

Judge Rules for NFL, Fanatics Against Small Apparel Seller

The lawsuit argued the NFL “aids and abets” Fanatics with its strategy.
Sponsored

Game On: Portfolio Players Stories, Brought to You by E*TRADE from Morgan Stanley

Dealmaker Jeffrey Kaplan maps the evolution of sports as an asset class
A set of trading cards
July 9, 2025

Judge Rules Against Fanatics as Panini Case Gets Rancorous

A judge ordered Fanatics to turn over unredacted trading card licenses.
May 9, 2024; Columbus, OH, USA; Sports are shown on TVs behind the bar as guests enjoy the grand opening of DraftKings Sports & Social in the Short North. Though there are no on-site betting windows, eligible customers can place bets through the DraftKings app.
July 3, 2025

PrizePicks Drops Suit Against Ex-Employee Who Left for DraftKings

The ex-employee still disputes the allegations.
Wander Franco
June 26, 2025

Wander Franco Convicted of Child Sex Abuse, Receives 2-Year Suspended Sentence

Franco can avoid jail time but is unlikely to return to MLB.
Wimbledon
June 25, 2025

Players Suing Tennis Begin Negotiations With Grand Slams

They may add the Slams as defendants if talks fail in 90 days.