• Loading stock data...
Monday, October 7, 2024
The Best Employers in Sports survey is now open! Take the survey
exclusive
Law

‘Still a Great Deal of Uncertainty’: Deposition Exposes Goodell’s and NFL’s Concussion Deliberations

  • In newly-unveiled court docs, the NFL commissioner appears to question the connection between concussions and long-term brain damage.
  • He also echoes a comparison he made in 2016, saying of the dangers associated with football, “There’s risks to walking down the street.”
Jeremy Reper-USA TODAY Sports

Only 18 months ago, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell questioned whether there is a link between concussions and long-term neurological damage, according to a recently unsealed transcript of a 2022 deposition taken in a lawsuit tied to the league’s head injury settlement, which has thus far paid out over $1.3 billion to thousands of ex-players who allege their brain maladies were caused by football. 

In the nearly nine-hour deposition from July 13, 2022, which was sealed until Saturday, when it appeared on a court docket, the commissioner said that there was a positive for the league when a player leaves his brain to science after committing suicide; he compared the risks associated with playing contact sports to walking down the street; and he expressed great frustration with the media’s coverage of head injuries, saying, “They misstate, they misrepresent things, and when they do that, they add to a narrative that I think is unfair and unfounded.”

Goodell’s deposition is one of a dozen-and-a-half that were unsealed over the weekend in a case brought by insurance companies suing to avoid covering the cost of the 2016 settlement, which ended a massive class action litigation brought by former players. That case settled before discovery commenced, making the deposition transcript drop by far the greatest public disclosure of the league’s internal deliberations around concussions since the first lawsuit was filed 13 years ago.

One of the insurers’ positions is that the NFL should not have settled because, they claim, there is no scientific evidence of causation between concussions and brain damage. The NFL is in the position of trying to straddle the causation issue because the league agreed to the settlement but also does not want to concede that playing football could lead to lifelong cognitive problems. 

“As you sit here today, sir, do you know whether there is any medical consensus regarding whether concussions result in long-term damage to NFL players who sustain concussions while playing in the NFL?” the insurers’ counsel asked Goodell, to which he replied, “I think there’s still a great deal of uncertainty about the causation issue, if that’s what you’re referring to.”

The commissioner appeared to be contradicted by his own general counsel, Jeff Pash, who when asked the same question in his deposition answered, “I think we’ve said that there ​​can be long-term effects.” The insurers’ counsel then asked Pash, “And are you aware that Commissioner Goodell testified that the causation has not yet been established regarding long-term effects of concussions as it related to concussions sustained by players during their playing days?” Pash replied that he had not been briefed on Goodell’s testimony. (New York Giants owner John Mara also acknowledged the associated risks in his deposition, saying: “It’s my understanding that repeated concussions can be very dangerous. As to what specifically they can cause, I’m not qualified to speak to that.”)

There is, of course, a generally accepted medical opinion that there is a connection between mild traumatic brain injuries and later cognitive maladies, even while it is true that definitive scientific proof of causation has not been established—not unlike the connection between smoking and cancer, which is, medically, widely agreed upon. (The NFL wrote in a statement provided to FOS on Tuesday: “The league’s position remains unchanged. Player health and safety is a top priority of the NFL, as the Commissioner testified and has long stated. The NFL has made and continues to make great strides to try to make the game safer for its players, including through rule changes, equipment advances, and by donating to and supporting critical scientific and medical research.”)

Goodell’s stating that there is uncertainty surrounding whether MTBIs are the spark for later-in-life neurological disorders would appear to feed into the insurers’ position that the NFL should have brought the concussion case to trial rather than settling. Elsewhere, the commissioner appeared to surprise the insurers’ counsel in answering a question about players who commit suicide and leave their brains to science.

The counsel asked him, “Did you find it an issue of concern for the NFL that multiple NFL  players committed suicide and left notes indicating that they wanted their brains studied, to determine whether their injuries resulted from their play in the NFL?” And Goodell replied, “I’m not sure I would agree with that entire statement. I think players who want to participate in the research necessary to advance science is a positive thing for us. Obviously, the circumstances are incredibly unfortunate.”

The insurers’ counsel asked back, “So, you think that the players who left notes and said, ‘I want my brain studied’ was a positive development towards science?”

Goodell answered, “When you have research and brains can be studied … hopefully something good comes from that and in discovery. That’s how science advances. Obviously, as I stated, the unfortunate circumstances of anybody committing suicide are horrific in and of themselves. But there are a lot of factors that probably go into that.”

Speaking at another point in the deposition about the NFL’s efforts to make the game safer, Goodell said, “We all know there’s risks with playing football and other sports. There’s risks to walking down the street.” That line evokes his press conference remark before Super Bowl 50, in 2016, when he said there were risks, too, in sitting on a couch. 

Also unsealed over the weekend: the deposition transcript from Goodell’s predecessor, Paul Tagliabue. During Tagliabue’s legal interview, he claimed not to remember one of his most infamous lines, when in 1994 he told an audience in New York, at the 92nd Street Y, that concussions were a “pack journalism issue.”

“As you sit here today, do you recall commenting in that program that the concussion problem was a pack journalism issue?” the insurers’ counsel asked. Tagliabue’s reply: No. “Well, in the last X number of years, it’s been asserted that I made some statements at that meeting, and I don’t recall making the statements or not. But if someone says I made them, I’ll accept the fact that I made them, but I don’t remember the context in which I made them.”

Taglaibue, now 83, also testified that he has not seen the 2015 movie Concussion, which depicts the NFL as seeking to cover up the health risks of head injuries. Unsurprisingly, the movie was not a hit in NFL offices. Paul Hicks, the league’s head of communications from 2010 to ’15, said in his deposition, “I thought it was a terrible movie. … Obviously, many other people did, too, since it did poorly at the box office.” But the league was concerned enough about the film’s reception that it hired Republican pollster Frank Luntz to conduct focus groups on the movie, Hicks said.

Like Goodell, Taglaibue said that he has not read any of the former players’ lawsuits against the NFL. In fact, Goodell testified that he was unaware the players’ lawsuits alleged that the league knew about the dangers of head injuries and covered it up.

“Are you aware that the underlying plaintiffs’ lawsuits against the NFL relating to concussions alleged that the NFL concealed information from the players about the medical research that was being done relating to concussions?” the insurers’ counsel asked, to which Goodell replied, “I’m not aware of that specific issue, no.”

All the parties involved in the lawsuit have motions before the New York state court asking the judge to rule in their favor. It is as part of that process that the judge agreed to unseal the transcripts, though parts were still redacted. The case was first filed in 2011 as a pre-emptive move by the insurers, after the first lawsuits were filed. The case was largely stayed until after the settlement, and it has been slowly progressing since.

Linkedin
Whatsapp
Copy Link
Link Copied
Link Copied

What to Read

MLB Poised for Huge Viewership Gains

A Dodgers-Yankees World Series is on the table.

Player Pushback to 18-Game Season

Some players want a second bye week for each team, among other things.
opinion

Where Is the Dang Game? Fragmentation Has Hit Fever Pitch

A correction is coming in the increasingly confusing landscape of live sports.

MLB Gets the Shohei Ohtani Postseason Treatment. The Value Is Immense

The Japanese superstar finally makes his playoff debut Saturday.
podcast thumbnail mobile
Front Office Sports Today

The FOS Interview: NBA Champion Matt Barnes

0:00

Featured Today

The Cal mascot, Oski

How the Calgorithm Turned College Football Twitter Into Real Life

“College GameDay” makes its first trip to Berkeley on Saturday.
Apr 8, 2022; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; The cleats of Philadelphia Phillies right fielder Bryce Harper (3) as he runs the bases against the Oakland Athletics during the seventh inning at Citizens Bank Park.
October 1, 2024

MLB Players Are Clamoring for Swag. Outfitting Them Is Big Business

Sliding mitts, cleats, and belts are fun, flashy, and lucrative.
Sep 25, 2024; Los Angeles, California, USA; San Diego Padres right fielder Fernando Tatis Jr. (23) celebrates after hitting a solo home run in the fifth inning against the Los Angeles Dodgers at Dodger Stadium.
September 30, 2024

The Padres’ Future Is on the Line This Postseason

The MLB playoffs could determine the team’s path forward.
Aug 3, 2024; East Rutherford, NJ, USA; Barcelona midfielder Pau Victor (8) celebrates his goal with teammates during the second half of an international friendly against Real Madrid at MetLife Stadium. V
September 29, 2024

FC Barcelona’s Overspending Triggered a Crisis. Has It Tightened Its Belt Enough?

The club is betting on their middle-road strategy to dig out.
Shohei Ohtani

At Least Three People Claim Ownership of Ohtani 50/50 Ball in Lawsuits

Two lawsuits have been filed claiming ownership of the historic baseball.
UCLA Bruins infielder Kyle Karros (44) grabs a bouncing ground ball as Auburn Tigers take on UCLA Bruins during the NCAA regional baseball tournament at Plainsman Park in Auburn, Ala., on Sunday, June 5, 2022.
September 26, 2024

UCLA Baseball Shut Out of Stadium Amid Veterans Lawsuit

UCLA leases land from the Veterans Affairs, which was recently ruled illegal.
October 2, 2024

Peloton Gets Investor Lawsuit Dismissed in District Court

The lawsuit claiming the company misled investors was dismissed.
Sponsored

Trend Report: Chiefs-Chargers, Tobacco Road Rivalry, Nebraska Sellout Streak

According to data from TickPick, some games this week will prove to be wallet-busters, climbing into the four figures.
Sep 14, 2024; Las Vegas, Nevada, USA; Brian Ortega of the United States (red gloves) fights Diego Lopes of Brazil (blue bloves) during Riyadh Season Noche UFC 306 at The Sphere.
September 26, 2024

New $375 Million Settlement Deal Announced in UFC Antitrust Lawsuit

UFC has agreed to $375 million in compensation—a $40 million increase from the original deal.
Norwegian soccer player Erling Haaland
September 26, 2024

Premier League’s Legal Costs Explode To $66 Million

Cases for Manchester City, Chelsea, and three others have been expensive.
September 24, 2024

Brett Favre Tells Congress He’s Been Diagnosed With Parkinson’s

The former quarterback testified about the problem of misused TANF funds.
May 19, 2024; New York, New York, USA; New York Knicks executive chairman James Dolan sits court side during the first quarter of game seven of the second round of the 2024 NBA playoffs against the Indiana Pacers at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory
September 20, 2024

Judge Dismisses Sex Trafficking Lawsuit Filed Against James Dolan

Plaintiff Kellye Croft’s legal team plans to appeal the decision.