• Loading stock data...
Tuesday, July 8, 2025

NCAA, Power Conferences Approve Settlement to Allow for Revenue Sharing

  • On Thursday, the Power 5 conferences and the NCAA announced they had authorized a settlement in House v. NCAA.
  • The agreement, though not final, would mark the first time in NCAA history that schools would share revenue with players.
Michigan defensive back Mike Sainristil celebrates a play against Washington during the second half of the national championship game at NRG Stadium in Houston on Monday, Jan. 8, 2024.
Junfu Han / USA TODAY NETWORK

The NCAA is one step closer to agreeing to a concept it has eschewed for a century: allowing schools to pay players. 

On Thursday, the Power 5 conferences and the NCAA announced they had all separately authorized a settlement in House v. NCAA. Plaintiff lawyers Jeffrey Kessler and Steve Berman announced in a separate statement that they had also agreed to the terms.

The lawsuit argues that players from the pre–name, image, and likeness era deserve back pay, and the definition of NIL should expand to include broadcast revenue. The NCAA and power conferences will split $2.75 billion in damages paid to thousands of Division I athletes who played between 2016 and ’21, a source confirmed to Front Office Sports. Each power conference school will start revenue-sharing around $20 million per year with players (or 22% of annual athletic department revenue)—a framework that could begin as early as ’25. Plaintiff lawyers estimated that athletes could earn around $20 billion in total over ten years.

“This settlement is also a road map for college sports leaders and Congress to ensure this uniquely American institution can continue to provide unmatched opportunity for millions of students,” the five commissioners and NCAA president Charlie Baker said in a joint statement.

The announcement caps off a historic week in college sports that dealt yet another major blow to the NCAA’s business model of amateurism. Beginning with the Big 12, each conference voted individually (including the former makeup of the Pac-12) between Tuesday and Thursday. Multiple NCAA committees also approved the settlement—though many of its D-I members were against it, given that they’ll face significant and, in their view, disproportionately high, cuts  to their annual revenue distribution from the governing body despite not being parties to the lawsuit. 

The settlement still faces plenty of hurdles, however. Lawyers will likely spend months hammering out additional details, including enforcement mechanisms, agreements for new scholarship limits, and the amount of money each qualified athlete receives, according to multiple reports. Then, Judge Claudia Wilken, who has presided over multiple NCAA antitrust cases including O’Bannon and Alston, must approve the settlement—but only after athletes get a chance to object.

If the agreement goes through, the NCAA will settle not only the House case but also two other similar antitrust lawsuits, Hubbard v. NCAA and Carter v. NCAA. But a third case, Fontenot v. NCAA, will not be consolidated into the settlement as the NCAA had hoped, a judge ruled on Thursday. That case is much broader than House, as it argues that all of the NCAA’s compensation restrictions are illegal.

But the settlement would not bring an end to the NCAA’s legal woes. It has no bearing on the most important question for the NCAA’s future: whether athletes should be classified as employees. The NCAA remains embroiled in three cases addressing this question: two regarding USC athletes and Dartmouth athletes, respectively, are winding through the bureaucracy of the National Labor Relations Board; the federal case Johnson v. NCAA, which concerns all D-I athletes, is in a holding pattern in the 3rd Circuit.  

The NCAA does, however, plan to use the House settlement to indirectly put these lawsuits to bed (as it even indicated in its statement on Thursday). The governing body will take the settlement to Congress as a sign of good faith showing it has made as many reforms to its business model as possible. It will then ask Congress to pass a law preventing the NCAA from having to make any other further changes. The strategy is part of a sophisticated, yearslong lobbying campaign to end the athletes’ rights era.

For now, however, athletes can expect to start receiving paychecks that many advocates and lawyers believe are long overdue. “We have been marching down this long legal road seeking economic justice in college sports for more than a decade,” Kessler said. “The time to bring a fair compensation system to college athletes has finally arrived.”

Linkedin
Whatsapp
Copy Link
Link Copied
Link Copied

What to Read

Louis, Missouri, UNITED STATES; Penn State Nittany Lions forward Nicholas DeGraves (17) celebrates with teammates after scoring a goal against the Boston University Terriers during the third period of the Frozen Four college ice hockey national semifinals at Enterprise Center

Gavin McKenna’s Penn State Commitment Cements College Hockey Supremacy

Gavin McKenna’s Penn State decision signals hockey’s rising stars now prefer NCAA.
exclusive

CBS, NFL Host James Brown Discussing Contract Extension

The 74-year-old Brown has hosted a record 10 Super Bowl pregame shows.
Nov 30, 2024; Lubbock, Texas, USA; Texas Tech Red Raiders running back Tahj Brooks (28) runs the ball against West Virginia Mountaineers defensive back Anthony Wilson Jr. (12) in the second half at Jones AT&T Stadium and Cody Campbell Field.

Felix Ojo’s Agent Says Texas Tech Offered $5.1M At Start of Rev-Share..

Texas Tech secured Ojo with a seven-figure NIL commitment.
Tennis

Wimbledon’s Rollout of Automated Line Judges Has Been Rocky

The electronic system briefly went down Sunday, leading to a controversial replay.

Featured Today

American Celebs Want to Be Sports Owners. Soccer Is Where They Start

As U.S. team prices climb, investors set their sights abroad.
July 5, 2025

Baseball’s Celebrity Row: Behind MLB’s First-Pitch Ritual

Often planned, sometimes spontaneous, the ritual throw is baseball’s celebrity row.
July 4, 2025

3,000 Hot Dogs, $20K in Prizes: Behind the Nathan’s Eating Contest

Nathan’s serves up thousands of hot dogs and $20,000 in prize money.
July 3, 2025

Geoffrey Esper Can’t Catch a Break at Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest

“Hot dogs is not one of my favorite competitions of the year.”
A helmt is seen during the Texas Tech football team's spring game, Saturday, April 19, 2025, at Jones AT&T Stadium.

CFB’s Revenue-Sharing Era Muddles Future of NIL, Adds PE Questions

Athletic departments can pay college athletes a combined $20.5 million this year.
July 3, 2025

Everything You Need to Know About EA’s Return to College Basketball Video..

There hasn’t been a college basketball game in more than 15 years.
July 6, 2025

Revenue-Sharing Chaos Begins as Texas Tech Secures Five-Star OT

The Red Raiders spent more than $10 million in the winter transfer portal.
Sponsored

Hottest Matchups Following NFL Schedule Release

The NFL released the 2025 regular-season schedule, and anticipation is already building in the ticket marketplace with four months to go.
Ohio State
July 1, 2025

Collectives Funnel $20 Million to College Athletes on Last Day Before Revenue..

Collectives frontloaded payments just before the revenue sharing era begins July 1.
July 1, 2025

Big Ten Commish Still Pushes for 4 Auto CFP Bids in 16-Team..

The conference wants four guaranteed spots in the Playoff.
June 30, 2025

College Sports Revenue-Sharing Underway As More Changes Loom

July 1 marks the first day schools can directly pay players.
June 30, 2025

Pac-12 Hits Football Membership Threshold With Texas State Entry

The school is paying $5 million to leave the Sun Belt Conference.