• Loading stock data...
Tuesday, July 15, 2025

Federal Judges Blast NCAA’s Amateurism Model

  • Judges at the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals fiercely attacked the NCAA’s amateurism model during a hearing Wednesday.
  • A verdict on the intermediary appeal will likely be handed down in a few months.
Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports

PHILADELPHIA — At the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday, a panel of three judges attacked the NCAA’s business model of amateurism during a hearing for the Johnson v. NCAA case. They asked searing questions about why athletes aren’t employees — and at some points drew laughter from the mostly filled courtroom. One judge flat-out said he didn’t agree with the NCAA. 

The case was originally brought by a group of athletes who are suing several schools and the NCAA, alleging they should be classified as university employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act, rather than amateurs. They claim they’re entitled to minimum wage in addition to scholarships. 

Lawyers for the athletes told Front Office Sports they don’t believe that an NCAA loss would spell the end of college sports, as the NCAA seems to suggest. It would, however, effectively kill the governing body’s core principle of amateurism.

Steven Katz, the lawyer for the NCAA who argued the case, said after the hearing he did not have a comment. The athletes’ lawyer Michael Willemin said that while he didn’t want to speculate about the judge’s final decision, he believed the “district court got it right” in the first place. 

“You can never take too much away from oral arguments,” Boise State sports law professor Sam Ehrlich told Front Office Sports. “But the focus of the discussion can’t be something the NCAA is too comfortable with.”

In The Courtroom

The hearing itself concerned a rare type of appeal called an “interlocutory appeal,” which reviews a decision made by a lower court judge in the middle of a case, rather than the final verdict. The issue, which the NCAA asked the court to review, was whether college athletes could plausibly be deemed employees.

The most resounding indictment of the NCAA came from Judge Theodore McKee, who stated point-blank that he didn’t understand how athletes couldn’t be considered employees. 

Judge Luis Felipe Restrepo added: “How are they not employees of the universities?” and referred to athletic departments as “regimes.”

Much of the conversation revolved around “whether there was an expectation of compensation,” Ehrlich noted — whether athletes expected to be paid, and if that could be evidence that they’re employees.

The NCAA is attempting to throw out employment case.

Question of NCAA Athletes as Employees Comes Under Focus

An appeals court considers a challenge to the NCAA’s business model.
February 15, 2023

Judges also asked whether there could be a distinction between athletes who play sports that bring in significant profit, like Power 5 football players, and those that don’t. McKee, for example, asked the court to consider a hypothetical in which no one watched the Rose Bowl, and March Madness was renamed “March Wasted Time.” Would athletes still be employees in that case?

Ehrlich said that line of questions suggests the judges believe revenue-sport athletes could be employees.

Willemin, the athletes’ lawyer, said the money an athlete makes — or expects — doesn’t necessarily define employment status. Instead, it’s the “control” the NCAA exerts on athletes. After all, schools control every aspect of athletes’ lives, from how many hours they attend “optional” practices to what classes they can take.

In all, the hearing took more than twice the allotted time. The judges’ panel was highly engaged, and appeared educated on how college sports work. 

“It felt a lot like the [NCAA v. Alston] oral arguments in my eyes, where the NCAA was forced into a position where they had to justify themselves a lot, and the athletes were only asked about the legal intricacies and the extent to which an eventual decision should apply,” Ehrlich said. The NCAA lost the Alston case at the Supreme Court level 9-0.

Next Steps

The appeals court will likely not hand down a verdict for at least a few months. 

If athletes win the appeal, the case will proceed. However, the NCAA won’t immediately have to start paying players — nothing will be official until the case reaches its conclusion. If they lose, it will get thrown out. Of course, both sides could continue to appeal.

In the past, other federal courts, like the Ninth Circuit and the Seventh Circuit, have agreed that college athletes aren’t employees. 

But there’s plenty of evidence to suggest that the tides are turning in the athletes’ favor, from the Alston case to the judges’ own commentary. Judge Restrepo appeared to invalidate the Seventh Circuit decision, saying the decision “was basically, ‘they’re amateurs because they’re calling them amateurs.’”

Either way, expect the NCAA to appeal the case up to the Supreme Court if it loses.

Plaintiffs’ Proposal

Both Willemin and his co-counsel, Paul McDonald, said that the NCAA has claimed paying players would bring about a “parade of horribles” — from decreased resources for women’s sports to the death of college sports altogether.

But the two contend that a post-Johnson world wouldn’t be nearly as much of a disruption to college sports as the NCAA claims. 

“I don’t give any credence to the NCAA’s claims that there’s going to be some sort of massive fallout from having to pay individuals minimum wage,” Willemin said. 

McDonald noted the case is simply asking for players in Division I to receive minimum wage based on hours worked. Anything else, like collective bargaining, would be adjudicated outside this case — like at the National Labor Relations Board. (And yes, the NLRB is going to rule on this issue.)

The NLRB Is Going After The NCAA’s Amateurism Model

It will investigate whether USC, the Pac-12, and NCAA violated labor law.
December 15, 2022

McDonald noted that athletes already submit time sheets for how many hours they play — so there’s an infrastructure to pay them. He also said schools could look at how they handle work-study, where other non-athlete students are paid for jobs around campus in addition to their scholarship. 

The big question, of course, is where schools would come up with the money. But if the increasing media rights contracts and coaching salaries are any indication, there’s more than enough to go around.

Linkedin
Whatsapp
Copy Link
Link Copied
Link Copied

What to Read

May 31, 2025; Philadelphia, PA, USA; Sydney McLaughin-Levrone (USA) reacts before the women's 100m hurdles during the Grand Slam Track Philadelphia at Franklin Field
exclusive

Track’s New Money Is Running Into Old Problems

The sport’s big-money era has hit some speed bumps in 2025.
Bobbleheads are seen at Vintage Indy Sports, Tuesday, April 29, 2025 in Speedway. The local sports memorabilia store opened recently.

Baseball’s Bobbleheads Are the Center of the Collectibles Universe

Baseball’s most important keepsake drives long lines—and big business.

NCAA: March Madness Expansion to 76 Teams ‘Still Viable’ for 2026

Negotiations continue with media rights holder CBS and TNT Sports.
Rimouski, QC - JUNE 1: Final Game of the 2025 Memorial Cup between the Medicine Hats Tigers and the London Knights on June 1, 2025, at the Colisée Financière Sun Life in Rimouski, Qc.

CHL Is Facing a ‘Pandora’s Box’ of Questions Amid NCAA Talent Departure

As players defect to college, the Canadian Hockey League won’t cede ground.

Featured Today

Jun 28, 2025; Arlington, Texas, USA; Seattle Mariners catcher Cal Raleigh (29) bats during the game between the Texas Rangers and the Seattle Mariners at Globe Life Field.

The Torpedo Bat Business Is Still Going Strong: ‘Here to Stay’

Demand for the oddly shaped bats has stayed strong across the sport.
July 6, 2025

American Celebs Want to Be Sports Owners. Soccer Is Where They Start

As U.S. team prices climb, investors set their sights abroad.
July 5, 2025

Baseball’s Celebrity Row: Behind MLB’s First-Pitch Ritual

Often planned, sometimes spontaneous, the ritual throw is baseball’s celebrity row.
July 4, 2025

3,000 Hot Dogs, $20K in Prizes: Behind the Nathan’s Eating Contest

Nathan’s serves up thousands of hot dogs and $20,000 in prize money.

Lane Kiffin: ‘Doesn’t Seem’ Like CFB Revenue-Sharing Cap Works Very Well

The outspoken Ole Miss football coach isn’t impressed with revenue-sharing guidelines.
July 14, 2025

SEC’s Greg Sankey: Conference Not Sold on Private Equity—for Now

SEC commissioner Greg Sankey said he’s taken PE meetings.
July 14, 2025

SEC’s Sankey Is ‘Fine’ With Big Ten’s Differing View on CFP Expansion

SEC commissioner Greg Sankey won’t commit to a 2026 CFP format.
Sponsored

Game On: Portfolio Players Stories, Brought to You by E*TRADE from Morgan Stanley

Dealmaker Jeffrey Kaplan maps the evolution of sports as an asset class
The Florida State Seminoles hosted the Florida Gators at Doak Campbell Stadium on Saturday, Nov. 30, 2024.
July 10, 2025

Athletic Departments Express Renewed Interest in PE in Wake of House Settlement

Schools now have more expenses—and are looking for creative solutions.
July 10, 2025

Deion Sanders Rips ‘Bulljunk’ in CFB, Calls for NFL-Style Salary Cap

Coach Prime is frustrated with the new revenue-sharing era.
Apr 4, 2025; Tampa, FL, USA; Connecticut Huskies guard KK Arnold (2)1 dribbles against UCLA Bruins forward Angela Dugalic (32) during the third quarter in a semifinal of the women's 2025 NCAA tournament at Amalie Arena.
July 10, 2025

‘Kind of a Joke’: Frustrations Mount As New NIL Deal Approval Process..

Delays have already led to athletes losing NIL opportunities.
Jul 9, 2025; Frisco, TX, USA; Head coaches Willie Fritz of Houston, Mike Gundy of Oklahoma State, Rich Rodriguez of West Virginia, Lance Leipold of Kansas, Sonny Dykes of TCU, Kyle Whittingham of Utah, Brent Brennan of Arizona and Deion Sanders of Colorado all sit on stage for a Coaches Roundtable during 2025 Big 12 Football Media Days at The Star.
July 9, 2025

Big 12 Commish: Conference Is ‘All In’ on International Expansion

The conference had once planned a large initiative in Mexico.