• Loading stock data...
Saturday, July 5, 2025

Federal Judges Blast NCAA’s Amateurism Model

  • Judges at the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals fiercely attacked the NCAA’s amateurism model during a hearing Wednesday.
  • A verdict on the intermediary appeal will likely be handed down in a few months.
Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports

PHILADELPHIA — At the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday, a panel of three judges attacked the NCAA’s business model of amateurism during a hearing for the Johnson v. NCAA case. They asked searing questions about why athletes aren’t employees — and at some points drew laughter from the mostly filled courtroom. One judge flat-out said he didn’t agree with the NCAA. 

The case was originally brought by a group of athletes who are suing several schools and the NCAA, alleging they should be classified as university employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act, rather than amateurs. They claim they’re entitled to minimum wage in addition to scholarships. 

Lawyers for the athletes told Front Office Sports they don’t believe that an NCAA loss would spell the end of college sports, as the NCAA seems to suggest. It would, however, effectively kill the governing body’s core principle of amateurism.

Steven Katz, the lawyer for the NCAA who argued the case, said after the hearing he did not have a comment. The athletes’ lawyer Michael Willemin said that while he didn’t want to speculate about the judge’s final decision, he believed the “district court got it right” in the first place. 

“You can never take too much away from oral arguments,” Boise State sports law professor Sam Ehrlich told Front Office Sports. “But the focus of the discussion can’t be something the NCAA is too comfortable with.”

In The Courtroom

The hearing itself concerned a rare type of appeal called an “interlocutory appeal,” which reviews a decision made by a lower court judge in the middle of a case, rather than the final verdict. The issue, which the NCAA asked the court to review, was whether college athletes could plausibly be deemed employees.

The most resounding indictment of the NCAA came from Judge Theodore McKee, who stated point-blank that he didn’t understand how athletes couldn’t be considered employees. 

Judge Luis Felipe Restrepo added: “How are they not employees of the universities?” and referred to athletic departments as “regimes.”

Much of the conversation revolved around “whether there was an expectation of compensation,” Ehrlich noted — whether athletes expected to be paid, and if that could be evidence that they’re employees.

The NCAA is attempting to throw out employment case.

Question of NCAA Athletes as Employees Comes Under Focus

An appeals court considers a challenge to the NCAA’s business model.
February 15, 2023

Judges also asked whether there could be a distinction between athletes who play sports that bring in significant profit, like Power 5 football players, and those that don’t. McKee, for example, asked the court to consider a hypothetical in which no one watched the Rose Bowl, and March Madness was renamed “March Wasted Time.” Would athletes still be employees in that case?

Ehrlich said that line of questions suggests the judges believe revenue-sport athletes could be employees.

Willemin, the athletes’ lawyer, said the money an athlete makes — or expects — doesn’t necessarily define employment status. Instead, it’s the “control” the NCAA exerts on athletes. After all, schools control every aspect of athletes’ lives, from how many hours they attend “optional” practices to what classes they can take.

In all, the hearing took more than twice the allotted time. The judges’ panel was highly engaged, and appeared educated on how college sports work. 

“It felt a lot like the [NCAA v. Alston] oral arguments in my eyes, where the NCAA was forced into a position where they had to justify themselves a lot, and the athletes were only asked about the legal intricacies and the extent to which an eventual decision should apply,” Ehrlich said. The NCAA lost the Alston case at the Supreme Court level 9-0.

Next Steps

The appeals court will likely not hand down a verdict for at least a few months. 

If athletes win the appeal, the case will proceed. However, the NCAA won’t immediately have to start paying players — nothing will be official until the case reaches its conclusion. If they lose, it will get thrown out. Of course, both sides could continue to appeal.

In the past, other federal courts, like the Ninth Circuit and the Seventh Circuit, have agreed that college athletes aren’t employees. 

But there’s plenty of evidence to suggest that the tides are turning in the athletes’ favor, from the Alston case to the judges’ own commentary. Judge Restrepo appeared to invalidate the Seventh Circuit decision, saying the decision “was basically, ‘they’re amateurs because they’re calling them amateurs.’”

Either way, expect the NCAA to appeal the case up to the Supreme Court if it loses.

Plaintiffs’ Proposal

Both Willemin and his co-counsel, Paul McDonald, said that the NCAA has claimed paying players would bring about a “parade of horribles” — from decreased resources for women’s sports to the death of college sports altogether.

But the two contend that a post-Johnson world wouldn’t be nearly as much of a disruption to college sports as the NCAA claims. 

“I don’t give any credence to the NCAA’s claims that there’s going to be some sort of massive fallout from having to pay individuals minimum wage,” Willemin said. 

McDonald noted the case is simply asking for players in Division I to receive minimum wage based on hours worked. Anything else, like collective bargaining, would be adjudicated outside this case — like at the National Labor Relations Board. (And yes, the NLRB is going to rule on this issue.)

The NLRB Is Going After The NCAA’s Amateurism Model

It will investigate whether USC, the Pac-12, and NCAA violated labor law.
December 15, 2022

McDonald noted that athletes already submit time sheets for how many hours they play — so there’s an infrastructure to pay them. He also said schools could look at how they handle work-study, where other non-athlete students are paid for jobs around campus in addition to their scholarship. 

The big question, of course, is where schools would come up with the money. But if the increasing media rights contracts and coaching salaries are any indication, there’s more than enough to go around.

Linkedin
Whatsapp
Copy Link
Link Copied
Link Copied

What to Read

Baseball’s Celebrity Row: Behind MLB’s First-Pitch Ritual

Often planned, sometimes spontaneous, the ritual throw is baseball’s celebrity row.

3,000 Hot Dogs, $20K in Prizes: Behind the Nathan’s Eating Contest

Nathan’s serves up thousands of hot dogs and $20,000 in prize money.

Geoffrey Esper Can’t Catch a Break at Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest

“Hot dogs is not one of my favorite competitions of the year.”
Ohio State

Collectives Funnel $20 Million to College Athletes on Last Day Before Revenue..

Collectives frontloaded payments just before the revenue sharing era begins July 1.

Featured Today

The Battle Over Wimbledon’s Ambitious Expansion Plan

A classic NIMBY standoff on one of the most hallowed grounds in sports.
Seattle Rough & Tumble
June 28, 2025

Women’s Sports Bars Are on the Rise. Survival Isn’t Guaranteed

Some women’s sports bars are cashing in. Others are clawing for funding.
June 27, 2025

Shitposters Have Taken the Reins of Pro Sports’ Official Voices

Meet the social media pros turning sports teams into internet trolls.
Jun 17, 2025; Sunrise, Florida, USA; Florida Panthers center Sam Reinhart (13) hoists the Stanley Cup after winning game six of the 2025 Stanley Cup Final against the Edmonton Oilers at Amerant Bank Arena
June 26, 2025

Stanley Cup’s International Summer Tour: Rules, Repairs, and Raucousness

No pro trophy tour compares to the NHL’s three-month global victory lap.

Everything You Need to Know About EA’s Return to College Basketball Video..

There hasn’t been a college basketball game in more than 15 years.
June 30, 2025

College Sports Revenue-Sharing Underway As More Changes Loom

July 1 marks the first day schools can directly pay players.
July 1, 2025

Big Ten Commish Still Pushes for 4 Auto CFP Bids in 16-Team..

The conference wants four guaranteed spots in the Playoff.
Sponsored

Hottest Matchups Following NFL Schedule Release

The NFL released the 2025 regular-season schedule, and anticipation is already building in the ticket marketplace with four months to go.
June 30, 2025

Pac-12 Hits Football Membership Threshold With Texas State Entry

The school is paying $5 million to leave the Sun Belt Conference.
Mar 23, 2025; Raleigh, NC, USA; Baylor Bears guard Jeremy Roach (3) reacts after a play during the first half against the Duke Blue Devils in the second round of the NCAA Tournament at Lenovo Center.
June 26, 2025

Power Four Put Finishing Touches on How Revenue Sharing Era Will Work

The agreement stipulates that schools can’t sue to challenge any terms of the settlement.
June 26, 2025

Pac-12 Rebuild Nears Completion With 2026 Texas State Addition

The Sun Belt school is likely joining the Pac-12 in 2026.
Sep 16, 2023; Stanford, California, USA; Sacramento State Hornets running back Elijah Tau-Tolliver (25) celebrates after a touchdown during the fourth quarter against the Stanford Cardinal at Stanford Stadium.
June 25, 2025

Sacramento State ‘Full Steam Ahead’ for FBS Despite Not Receiving NCAA Waiver

The Hornets launched a public campaign to join the FBS last fall.