• Loading stock data...
Saturday, September 6, 2025
Fox Analyst and Media Entrepreneur Greg Olsen to Speak at Tuned In Get your ticket now!

Federal Judge ‘Concerned’ with House v. NCAA Settlement Proposal

  • Judge Claudia Wilken said she is “quite concerned” about multiple aspects related to NIL and future litigation.
  • Attorneys agreed to set a three-week deadline to edit the proposal.
Sep 2, 2024; Tallahassee, Florida, USA; Florida State Seminoles linebacker Justin Cryer (28) reacts during the fourth quarter against the Boston College Eagles at Doak S. Campbell Stadium.
Melina Myers-USA TODAY Sports

In the words of Northern District of California Court Judge Claudia Wilken, it’s “back to the drawing board” on the potentially landmark House v. NCAA settlement proposal.

Wilken did not grant preliminary approval for the settlement during a virtual hearing on Thursday. Attorneys involved in the case agreed to set a three-week deadline to edit the proposal and resubmit it to the court.

Wilken raised concerns about major aspects of the proposal. She took issue with restrictions on NIL payments, asked tough questions about a revenue-sharing cap, and asked to add language to ensure that the settlement still allows for other antitrust lawsuits against the NCAA. Wilken offered to submit preliminary approval for one of the three cases negotiated in the settlement proposal, called Hubbard v. NCAA, while the parties renegotiate some of the House v. NCAA aspect of the deal. The NCAA’s attorney, Rakesh Kilaru, said the governing body would not agree to that.

There was even talk of preparing for a trial date if the parties couldn’t agree to certain changes to the settlement.

Wilken’s comments, in several cases, reflected points raised by objecting lawyers including Steven Molo, who represented a group of female athletes arguing that women’s sports athletes should get more in the settlement, and Garrett Broshuis, representing athletes in the ongoing Fontenot v. NCAA case. She raised other issues in line with the opinion of the National College Players Association, which said it intends to put together a group of athlete objectors.

The case, first filed in 2020, argues athletes should receive back-pay for several years before the NCAA changed its NIL (name, image, and likeness) rules, as well as expand the definition of NIL to include things like broadcast revenue. Defendants include the NCAA and Power 5 conferences.

The 300-page settlement proposal consolidates two other antitrust cases related to athlete compensation restrictions, Hubbard v. NCAA and Carter v. NCAA. The crux of the settlement says the NCAA and power conferences would pay $2.8 billion in back-damages to athletes who couldn’t benefit from NIL before 2021 (mostly football and men’s basketball players, but most of Division I if not all would be eligible for something). Schools would also be allowed to share up to a certain percentage of revenue with athletes, starting at around $22 million per year. Beyond these big-ticket items, the settlement sets up restrictions including a cap on revenue sharing, an approval process for any NIL deals over $600, and an obligation for plaintiff lawyers and class members to lobby in Congress to codify the settlement into law. 

Wilken said she was “quite concerned” about the NIL rules, which allow NIL deals over $600 to be blocked if they’re seen by a third party as above fair market value. “I’ve found that taking things away from people is usually not very popular,” says Wilken. She also noted that the rules may not be enforceable legally, given that the definition of the word “booster” didn’t make much sense to her.

Plaintiff lawyers suggested they would be in favor of amending this part of the proposal—but the NCAA would not be. Kilaru called these NIL restrictions essential. “Without it, I’m not sure there will be a settlement to submit,” he said. 

In response, Wilken said that the lawyers would just have to “go back to the drawing board.” She said attorneys need to come up with language surrounding NIL that is workable, enforceable, and fair.

Wilken also indicated that she has no intention of letting the NCAA off the hook for future challenges. Some of her requests seemed to be more well-received than others.

She said she was “quite concerned” about who would represent future athletes in potential lawsuits challenging the revenue-sharing cap, or other areas of the settlement.

Wilken asked for the settlement to include language that several major lawsuits would be able to go forward even if the House case is settled: Johnson v. NCAA, a case arguing D-I athletes should be considered employees, as well as Choh v. Ivy League, a case arguing the Ivy League is illegally prohibiting athletic scholarships. “Maybe I’m being overly cautious,” joked Wilken, who has heard both the landmark O’Bannon and Alston cases. 

Additionally, Wilken asked for language to ensure that schools wouldn’t be protected from Title IX lawsuits in the future if they violate the gender equity statute in implementing the settlement terms, like revenue-sharing. 

The NCAA, for its part, hopes to convince Congress to create a law based on the settlement—one that prevents athlete employment status once and for all. But other organizations like Huma’s are already battling in court and in Congress. A group called Athletes.org put out a statement Wednesday saying that while it supports the settlement, athletes should be able to collectively bargain with schools in the future.

The settlement proposal has a long way to go before Congress can even consider it. “Based on [Wilken’s] comments today, we have to discuss whether we have a deal,” Kilaru said.

Linkedin
Whatsapp
Copy Link
Link Copied
Link Copied

What to Read

Ohio State Buckeyes quarterback Julian Sayin (10) and linebacker C.J. Hicks (11) shake hands while leaving the field following the NCAA football game at Ohio Stadium on Aug. 30, 2025. Ohio State won 14-7

How Ohio State Rebuilt Its NIL Strategy in the Rev-Share Era

The Buckeyes are staying “aggressive” in the new NIL landscape.

NIL Go Corrects Its Data From $80M in Deals Cleared to $35M,..

It’s another bump in the rocky rollout of the new NIL clearinghouse.

Fox, ESPN Cry Foul Over Big Nielsen Number Expected for YouTube’s NFL..

Fox and ESPN executives criticized Nielsen’s use of custom measurement for YouTube.
Blue Jays
exclusive

MLBPA, DraftKings Agree to Settle NIL Suit

MLBPA said DraftKings and other sportsbooks improperly used players’ NIL.

Featured Today

Dec 21, 2024; Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes (15) gets ready to take the field prior to a game against the Houston Texans at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium.

How Brazil Game Fits Into NFL’s Plans for World Domination

Friday night’s Chiefs-Chargers game in São Paulo is big by design.
Oct 13, 2024; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts (1) and wide receiver A.J. Brown (11) celebrate their touchdown pass during the second quarter against the Cleveland Browns at Lincoln Financial Field.
September 2, 2025

TV Ratings Just Changed Again. The NFL Will Be the Big Winner

Nielsen’s new viewership system will have a big impact on sports.
Ohio State Buckeyes wide receiver Jeremiah Smith (4) celebrates with offensive lineman Donovan Jackson (74) after a touchdown catch against Notre Dame Fighting Irish in the first quarter during the College Football Playoff National Championship at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta on January 20, 2025.
August 30, 2025

The Most Expensive Roster Year in College Football History

The House settlement created revenue-sharing—and a big NIL loophole.
August 26, 2025

‘You’re Going to Get Beat Up’: The Liberty’s All-Male Practice Squad

A select group suits up weekly to take on the defending champs.
Workers set up the stages for the “Fox Big Noon Kickoff” sports show live telecast before Saturday’s Iowa State and Iowa football game at Jack Trice Stadium in Ames, Iowa.
exclusive
September 3, 2025

Big 12 Embraces Dave Portnoy and Barstool Sports

The conference held a call with Portnoy to discuss coverage and collaboration.
Arch Manning
September 4, 2025

NIL Go Says It Has Cleared $80 Million in NIL Deals So..

NIL collectives, however, say the majority of their deals are in limbo.
Sponsored

Trailblazer Cal Calamia Is Racing for ‘Advocacy, Storytelling, and Performance’

The marathoner wants excellence—not just inclusion—to be the goal for non-binary athletes.
Aug 30, 2025; Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Vanderbilt Commodores linebacker Langston Patterson (10) looks over the defense against the Charleston Southern Buccaneers during the first half at FirstBank Stadium.
September 3, 2025

Latest Class Action Eligibility Lawsuit Challenges NCAA’s ‘Redshirt’ Rule

It’s the latest lawsuit challenging the NCAA’s core eligibility requirements.
The cast of ESPN College GameDay begins their show prior to the NCAA football game between the Ohio State Buckeyes and the Texas Longhorns at Ohio Stadium on Aug. 30, 2025. The show is the final one for Lee Corso.
September 2, 2025

OSU Sophomore Wins $250K in McAfee ‘GameDay’ Kicking Contest

The former NFL punter started offering prize money for kicks in 2023.
Aug 30, 2025; Columbus, Ohio, USA; Texas Longhorns quarterback Arch Manning (16) drops back to pass against the Ohio State Buckeyes in the first half at Ohio Stadium.
September 2, 2025

On This Year’s CFB Rosters, Even Backup QBs Make Six Figures

The going rate for backup quarterbacks is in the mid-six-figures.
Mike Gundy
September 2, 2025

OSU’s Gundy, Oregon’s Lanning Trade Barbs Over Alleged $30 Million Gap

Lanning ripped Gundy’s “excuse” and said “we spend to win.”