As the Bears look to reach their first conference championship game since the 2010 season, a two-state bidding war is rapidly breaking out over the NFL team’s future home.
The city of Gary, Ind., released three renderings Friday of potential stadium concepts in that locale, with a trio of possible sites described as “plug-and-play” locales for a new, domed stadium and a mixed-use development.
The move closely follows the Bears expanding their long-running search for a venue site to Indiana in the wake of political difficulties in Illinois, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell visiting prospective sites in Gary last weekend as part of a tour with team officials, and the introduction this week of a state bill in Indiana to create a financial framework to help finance the stadium.
In particular, that bill would establish the Northwest Indiana Stadium Authority to help oversee the move of the Bears to the state.
“A move to Gary isn’t just about a building; it’s about building a dynasty,” said Gary Mayor Eddie Melton in a statement. “No other location offers this combination of proximity, identity alignment, and iconic visual connection to Chicago.”
Not to be outdone, though, Arlington Heights, Ill., made its own statement Friday, as Mayor Jim Tinaglia said the city wants to close a deal with the Bears and not “fumble this opportunity.” The suburban locale is where the Bears own a 326-acre parcel and where they had been focused on building the stadium, but have run into a series of political obstacles. More recently, though, key opponents to the Bears’ efforts, including Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, are changing their tone significantly.
“We must stand together, not as Arlington Heights residents, not as Chicago residents. We’re all Illinoisians today,” Tinaglia said. “This is about keeping the Bears in Illinois and giving them the tools to do so.”
Pritzker is also no longer insisting that the Bears pay off the entire $532 million in outstanding debt on prior Soldier Field renovations before considering anything new for the team—another material change in the ongoing conversation.
A key part of the remaining Illinois puzzle, though, is the Bears gaining needed state help to allow it to negotiate its property taxes with local governments.
“I believe it’s best for the Bears to stay in the state of Illinois,” Pritzker said Friday. “I’ve always said that. I do not think the fans want the Chicago Bears to be based anywhere else except in the state of Illinois.”
Negotiating Dynamics
The Bears’ situation recalls the recent, cross-border battle for the Chiefs, with the four-time Super Bowl winners ultimately choosing Kansas last month over Missouri to build a domed stadium and mixed-use development for their future team headquarters.
As a result, the Bears have more energy surrounding their stadium discussion than they have had in the nearly three years of actively pursuing the project. As recently as last month, the team said it was told by Illinois leaders that the stadium “will not be a priority in 2026.” But the situation is now escalating quickly.
If the Bears can complete a deal on either side of the border, they would also join a fast-growing wave of stadium development across the NFL. That facility boom includes the forthcoming venues for the Bills and Titans, opening in 2026 and 2027, respectively, and ones planned for the Browns, Broncos, and Commanders, in addition to the Chiefs. Others, such as the Eagles, are considering new venues as well.
Before the recent developments in Indiana, the Bears had reduced their ask of public-sector help from roughly half of the total project cost of more than $5 billion to $855 million for infrastructure.
Chicago will host a divisional playoff game Sunday at 6:30 p.m. ET against the Rams, with the contest holding a featured broadcast position on NBC. Game conditions, however, are expected to be frigid, with an expected wind chill of below zero degrees.
