May 27, 2022

Read in Browser

Front Office Sports Pro

Happy Friday!   

This is the Pro monthly update. This month, we are bringing you the top 10 deals from the month of May, key earnings releases, and One Big Thing about the Oakland Athletics’ Howard Terminal project. As always, if you have any questions, comments, or suggestions, please reach out to me directly at liam@fos.company.

Pro May 2022 Update

Design: Alex Brooks

Reports This Month

  • Scouting Report: The Crypto Market’s Impact on Sports Sponsorships
  • Scouting Report: The Power of Short-Form Video
  • Heat Check: The Cloud’s Growing Impact on Sports

One Big Thing

The Oakland Athletics have struggled for years to find a new home — inside or outside Oakland. Through the first five-and-a-half weeks of the 2022 season, the A’s are currently last in Major League Baseball in attendance, averaging only 8,421 fans per game — in a stadium that seats 57,000.

Down attendance is nothing unique to Athletics, and the league’s median attendance is down ~2,000 from 2019. And elsewhere in the Bay Area, San Francisco Giants are down ~3,000 attendees from their 2019 figures. But the Athletics are down close to 12,000 a game, by far the biggest differential in the league.

Worse, the struggle to draw fans comes at a time when the team has reached its lowest level of spending on player salaries. The A’s are currently spending $47 million on payroll — the lowest figure for the team in 20 years. 

Even more worrisome, the Athletics’ Triple-A affiliate, the Las Vegas Aviators, — have been able to draw more fans than their big-league counterparts. In April, the minor league team was able to draw 33% more fans than the Athletics despite 20% less stadium capacity.  

  • Oakland Athletics: 3,748
  • Las Vegas Aviators: 5,607

All of this stems, in large part, from the stadium itself. Major League Baseball has clearly indicated that Oakland needs an upgrade. In 2021, commissioner Rob Manfred stated, “Both Oakland and Tampa need new facilities. It’s kind of beyond debate at this point. Oakland is probably critical, just in terms of the condition of the ballpark.”

Coupled with the team’s spending habits, onlookers are sure of one thing — change is coming to Oakland. Politics will continue to dictate what the ultimate result will be for the franchise, but here is how things stand. 

Spend Down, Prices Up

Although spending on player salaries is down and attendance is bottoming, the Athletics used the 2022 season to increase their ticket prices. 

According to the Mercury News, ticket prices have in some cases more than doubled since pre-pandemic 2019 levels. The publication specifically cited that two seats in Section 225 had gone from $2,950 in 2019 to $6,500 this season.

The price hikes are further explored in a piece by The Athletic writers Eno Sarris and Ken Rosethal. They  cite various ticket-holders who have experienced anywhere from 50% to 150% increases in the price of their season tickets, while also losing access to in-stadium experiences. 

The Howard Terminal

Earlier in May, the Athletics were granted approval by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission to build a new waterfront stadium development complex in the Howard Terminal area. 

To date, one of the project’s largest adversaries has been the shipping industry — one of the industries most impacted by the lockdowns of the past two years and subsequent supply chain crunch. A consortium of shipping companies has lobbied against the proposed 34,000-seat stadium project, which includes a hotel and residential development, as it would take away valuable square footage at the port.

  • About $1 billion will go toward a 35,000-seat ballpark — that’s almost half the capacity of the team’s current home, which seats 63,000.
  • The project includes a 400-room hotel, 270,000 square feet of retail space, 3,000 housing units, and around $450 million in community benefits.

While the Terminal is currently the country’s eighth-busiest shipping container hub for imports, the Commission released a preliminary report in early May recommending that the conversion be approved — despite a recent consultant’s report claiming that without Howard Terminal, Oakland could run out of container-handling space around 2050.

If the Athletics want to stay in Oakland, there is still work to be done. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control also needs to grant approval, while final say will go to Alameda County.     

Viva Las Vegas 

If the Howard Terminal plans fall through, there’s always Sin City. The team has been spending hundreds of thousands of dollars each month looking at relocation options in Las Vegas. 

In April, the team had bids on five locations. That list has whittled down to two. While the exact locations of the sites aren’t known, there are two clear paths for the Vegas plan. 

According to the Las Vegas Sun, the Athletics are unable to disclose which sites are under consideration, but the goal is to secure land for a possible $1 billion, 30,000-seat ballpark near the resort corridor. Of the two options, one is a lot in which the team would have sole ownership unless it enters a public-private partnership, while the other would be in partnership with a resort operator.

According to the Las Vegas Review Journal, some form of public assistance could be made available to help lure the Athletics to Las Vegas, per Steve Hill, CEO and president of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority. The assistance would come outside the room tax — the mechanism used to fund some of the $750 million for Allegiant Stadium. 

Oakland is not the only team looking for an upgrade. The Buffalo Bills, Tennessee Titans, Los Angeles Angels, and Washing Commanders are all in the process of either upgrading or relocating. The various projects have accelerated conversations around the extent to which tax dollars should subsidize these “economic developments.” 

The jury is still out — but Oakland’s ultimate decision on the Howard Terminal stadium project will serve as an indication of how future funding packages for stadiums could look.

Deal Tracker

Deal Tracker

Here are 10 of the most notable deals from the month of May.

  • Nintendo, a Japanese multinational that develops video games and consoles, sold a 5% stake in the company to Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund through a private placement.
  • USA Cricket, America’s first-ever professional Twenty20 cricket league, raised $44 million in Series A and A1 funding rounds, which includes an additional commitment of $76 million over the next 12 months. The investment group was led by Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. 
  • PFL, operator of an MMA sports league intended to serve individual fighters, raised $30 million in a Series E venture funding deal led by Waverley Capital.
  • Team Liquid, operator of an online esports community platform that provides gaming news content to its users, raised $35 million in venture funding in a deal led by Ares Management.
  • Epic Games, which develops software and applications designed for gamers and game developers to publish and play immersive games, raised $2 billion of venture funding from Sony and KIRKB.
  • Fancurve, developer of a digital sports fashion platform to share and engage fandom through jerseys and collectibles, raised $6.25 million in Series 1 seed funding in a deal led by Greenfield One Management.
  • InfiniGods, developer of blockchain games in a mythological universe, raised $9 million in seed funding from undisclosed investors.
  • Omorpho, designer of premium sports and fitness clothes intended to revolutionize training with a micro-weighted gravity sportswear collection, raised $6 million of seed funding in a deal led by KB Partners.
  • MetaKing Studios, a New York-based developer of Web3 MMO games, raised $15m in seed funding. Makers Fund and BitKraft Ventures co-led and were joined by Delphi Digital, Animoca Brands, Shima Capital, WW Ventures, Spartan Group, and Huobi Ventures.
  • Altan Insights, developer of an information platform designed to access information in the emerging fractional share alternative asset investment space, raised $4 million of seed funding in a deal led by Slow Ventures, Operator Partners, CourtsideVC, GoodFriends, and Alexis Ohanian.
Earnings Summary

Earnings Summary

Selected earnings calls and results from the past month:

Electronic Arts: EA could be eyeing a merger with a media giant after record year.

Flutter Entertainment: The Super Bowl lifted FanDuel during $1.6B quarter.

Disney: The Mouse could make ESPN streaming-only after adding 1 million subscribers. 

Take-Two: Take-Two sealed a $12.7B deal with ‘FarmVille’ maker after posting $930M in revenue.

F45: F45 Training revenue jumped 175% in Q1 of the fiscal year. 

On Running: On Running saw first-quarter revenue increase by 67.9%.

Peloton: Peloton reported a 24% year-over-year revenue decline in a dismal third quarter.

Endeavor: Endeavor posted Q1 revenue of $1.47B, up 37.7% year-over-year.

Planet Fitness: PF reported $16.5M in net income for Q1 2022. 

Liberty Media: LM generated $2.19B in revenue in Q1 2022, with $360M going to F1.

DraftKings: The company posted revenue of $417 million in Q1 2022 with $468M in losses.

Penn National Gaming: The company generated $1.6B in revenue in Q1 2022.

Closing

Closing

Axios and Harris Poll recently released their Corporate Reputation Rankings, a list intended to gauge the reputation of the most visible brands in America, based on 20 years of Harris Poll research. The poll 100 is based on a survey of 33,096 Americans in a nationally representative sample. 

This year’s list saw some of the world’s most prominent companies drop considerably, with social media companies proving to be some of the least “trustworthy,” according to the ranking. 

  • TikTok: 94
  • Meta: 97
  • Twitter: 98

Interestingly, Amazon retained a higher spot on the list (8) despite its various issues related to labor unions. Despite some negative press, however, their public perception hasn’t been tarnished to the same level of the social media companies. Big commerce and hardware companies (i.e. Apple and Samsung) also fared better — indicating that strong corporate governance and culture (i.e. Patagonia) and business models that skew away from content and content moderation garner more trust. 

One company of note that saw its ranking plummet from last year was Disney. The Mouse dropped from 37th last year to 65th, likely due to some of the company’s recent political intervention in Florida. According to John Gerzema, CEO of the Harris Poll, the reason for Disney’s fall from grace might be due to lack of perceived genuineness.

“Disney’s about-face shows the reputational hit that comes when the public perceives you as being calculating rather than clear in what you believe in and stand for.”

Topping the list? Trader Joe’s. Maybe all it takes to win over consumer trust is reasonably priced groceries. 

Advertise Awards Learning Events Video Shows
Written by Liam Killingstad

If this email was forwarded to you, you can subscribe here.

Update your preferences / Unsubscribe

Copyright © 2022 Front Office Sports. All rights reserved.
460 Park Avenue South, 7th Floor, New York NY, 10016

Subscribe To Our Daily Newsletters

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.